Jim Cook vs. Kiki Cuyler — Career Comparison
On the career numbers, Kiki Cuyler posted the stronger offensive profile against Jim Cook. Kiki Cuyler posted stronger numbers in OPS (.860 vs .434) and on-base percentage (.386 vs .241). By the career numbers, Kiki Cuyler had the stronger overall case — though those totals don't account for the eras and run environments each player worked in.
Hitting Stats for Jim Cook and Kiki Cuyler
Jim Cook
Career
Per 600 PA
8
165.52
Kiki Cuyler
Career
Per 600 PA
1879
139.22
Jim Cook
Career
Per 600 PA
0.154
0.154
Kiki Cuyler
Career
Per 600 PA
0.321
0.321
Jim Cook
Career
Per 600 PA
0.494
0.494
Kiki Cuyler
Career
Per 600 PA
0.891
0.891
Jim Cook
Career
Per 600 PA
0.25
0.25
Kiki Cuyler
Career
Per 600 PA
0.295
0.295
Jim Cook
Career
Per 600 PA
1.57
32.56
Kiki Cuyler
Career
Per 600 PA
1365.99
101.21
Jim Cook
Career
Per 600 PA
7
144.83
Kiki Cuyler
Career
Per 600 PA
3060
226.72
Jim Cook
Career
Per 600 PA
0.241
0.241
Kiki Cuyler
Career
Per 600 PA
0.386
0.386
Jim Cook
Career
Per 600 PA
0.192
0.192
Kiki Cuyler
Career
Per 600 PA
0.474
0.474
Jim Cook
Career
Per 600 PA
0.039
0.039
Kiki Cuyler
Career
Per 600 PA
0.153
0.153
Jim Cook
Career
Per 600 PA
0.157
0.157
Kiki Cuyler
Career
Per 600 PA
0.292
0.292
Jim Cook
Career
Per 600 PA
0.409
0.409
Kiki Cuyler
Career
Per 600 PA
0.907
0.907
Jim Cook
Career
Per 600 PA
5
103.45
Kiki Cuyler
Career
Per 600 PA
2242
166.12
Jim Cook
Career
Per 600 PA
1.35
27.88
Kiki Cuyler
Career
Per 600 PA
1438.67
106.59
Jim Cook
Career
Per 600 PA
4.14
4.14
Kiki Cuyler
Career
Per 600 PA
10.77
10.77
Jim Cook
Career
Per 600 PA
0.29
0.29
Kiki Cuyler
Career
Per 600 PA
0.9
0.9
Jim Cook
Career
Per 600 PA
1
20.69
Kiki Cuyler
Career
Per 600 PA
355
26.3
Jim Cook
Career
Per 600 PA
100
100
Kiki Cuyler
Career
Per 600 PA
92.39
92.39
Fielding Stats for Jim Cook and Kiki Cuyler
Jim Cook
Career
Per 9 Innings
8
1.36
Kiki Cuyler
Career
Per 9 Innings
1807
Jim Cook
Career
Per 9 Innings
20
3.4
Kiki Cuyler
Career
Per 9 Innings
4225
Jim Cook
Career
Per 9 Innings
90.91
90.91
Kiki Cuyler
Career
Per 9 Innings
97.22