Rip Conway vs. Patrick McKenna — Career Comparison
Looking at the career totals, Rip Conway and Patrick McKenna are closely matched on the surface stats. Patrick McKenna posted stronger numbers in slugging (.200 vs .167) and batting average (.200 vs .167). Rip Conway had the advantage in on-base percentage (.231 vs .200). By the career numbers, Patrick McKenna had the stronger overall case — though those totals don't account for the eras and run environments each player worked in.
Hitting Stats for Rip Conway and Patrick McKenna
Rip Conway
Career
Per 600 PA
28
600
Patrick McKenna
Career
Per 600 PA
5
600
Rip Conway
Career
Per 600 PA
0.167
0.167
Patrick McKenna
Career
Per 600 PA
0.2
0.2
Rip Conway
Career
Per 600 PA
0.494
0.494
Patrick McKenna
Career
Per 600 PA
0.4
0.4
Rip Conway
Career
Per 600 PA
1.15
24.59
Patrick McKenna
Career
Per 600 PA
0.18
21.64
Rip Conway
Career
Per 600 PA
6
128.57
Patrick McKenna
Career
Per 600 PA
1
120
Rip Conway
Career
Per 600 PA
0.231
0.231
Patrick McKenna
Career
Per 600 PA
0.2
0.2
Rip Conway
Career
Per 600 PA
0.167
0.167
Patrick McKenna
Career
Per 600 PA
0.2
0.2
Rip Conway
Career
Per 600 PA
0.146
0.146
Patrick McKenna
Career
Per 600 PA
0.14
0.14
Rip Conway
Career
Per 600 PA
0.35
0.35
Patrick McKenna
Career
Per 600 PA
0.25
0.25
Rip Conway
Career
Per 600 PA
1.2
25.78
Patrick McKenna
Career
Per 600 PA
0.18
21.95
Rip Conway
Career
Per 600 PA
7
7
Patrick McKenna
Career
Per 600 PA
5
5
Rip Conway
Career
Per 600 PA
0
0
Patrick McKenna
Career
Per 600 PA
0
0
Fielding Stats for Rip Conway and Patrick McKenna
Rip Conway
Career
Per 9 Innings
6
Patrick McKenna
Career
Per 9 Innings
1
1.13
Rip Conway
Career
Per 9 Innings
22
Patrick McKenna
Career
Per 9 Innings
1
1.13
Rip Conway
Career
Per 9 Innings
18
Patrick McKenna
Career
Per 9 Innings
1
1.13
Rip Conway
Career
Per 9 Innings
81.82
Patrick McKenna
Career
Per 9 Innings
100
100