Ned Connor vs. Jim Hicks — Career Comparison
On the career numbers, Jim Hicks posted the stronger offensive profile against Ned Connor. Jim Hicks posted stronger numbers in OPS (.580 vs .424) and on-base percentage (.261 vs .212). Ned Connor had the advantage in batting average (.212 vs .163). By the career numbers, Jim Hicks had the stronger overall case — though those totals don't account for the eras and run environments each player worked in.
Hitting Stats for Ned Connor and Jim Hicks
Ned Connor
Career
Per 600 PA
0.212
0.212
Jim Hicks
Career
Per 600 PA
0.163
0.163
Ned Connor
Career
Per 600 PA
0.424
0.424
Jim Hicks
Career
Per 600 PA
0.599
0.599
Ned Connor
Career
Per 600 PA
0.212
0.212
Jim Hicks
Career
Per 600 PA
0.256
0.256
Ned Connor
Career
Per 600 PA
0.212
0.212
Jim Hicks
Career
Per 600 PA
0.319
0.319
Ned Connor
Career
Per 600 PA
0.149
0.149
Jim Hicks
Career
Per 600 PA
0.195
0.195
Ned Connor
Career
Per 600 PA
0.269
0.269
Jim Hicks
Career
Per 600 PA
0.521
0.521
Ned Connor
Career
Per 600 PA
1.57
28.6
Jim Hicks
Career
Per 600 PA
11.47
42.76
Fielding Stats for Ned Connor and Jim Hicks
Ned Connor
Career
Per 9 Innings
7
0.98
Jim Hicks
Career
Per 9 Innings
50
1.55
Ned Connor
Career
Per 9 Innings
7
0.98
Jim Hicks
Career
Per 9 Innings
35
1.08
Ned Connor
Career
Per 9 Innings
50
7.03
Jim Hicks
Career
Per 9 Innings
132
4.09
Ned Connor
Career
Per 9 Innings
41
5.77
Jim Hicks
Career
Per 9 Innings
129
4
Ned Connor
Career
Per 9 Innings
82
82
Jim Hicks
Career
Per 9 Innings
97.73
97.73
Ned Connor
Career
Per 9 Innings
5.857
5.857
Jim Hicks
Career
Per 9 Innings
2.58
2.58
Ned Connor
Career
Per 9 Innings
100
100
Jim Hicks
Career
Per 9 Innings
70
70