Ned Connor vs. Milt Graff — Career Comparison
On the career numbers, Milt Graff posted the stronger offensive profile against Ned Connor. Milt Graff posted stronger numbers in OPS (.502 vs .424) and on-base percentage (.259 vs .212). Ned Connor had the advantage in batting average (.212 vs .179). By the career numbers, Milt Graff had the stronger overall case — though those totals don't account for the eras and run environments each player worked in.
Hitting Stats for Ned Connor and Milt Graff
Ned Connor
Career
Per 600 PA
0.212
0.212
Milt Graff
Career
Per 600 PA
0.18
0.18
Ned Connor
Career
Per 600 PA
0.424
0.424
Milt Graff
Career
Per 600 PA
0.534
0.534
Ned Connor
Career
Per 600 PA
0.212
0.212
Milt Graff
Career
Per 600 PA
0.259
0.259
Ned Connor
Career
Per 600 PA
0.212
0.212
Milt Graff
Career
Per 600 PA
0.244
0.244
Ned Connor
Career
Per 600 PA
0.149
0.149
Milt Graff
Career
Per 600 PA
0.177
0.177
Ned Connor
Career
Per 600 PA
0.269
0.269
Milt Graff
Career
Per 600 PA
0.425
0.425
Ned Connor
Career
Per 600 PA
1.57
28.6
Milt Graff
Career
Per 600 PA
9.73
32.97
Fielding Stats for Ned Connor and Milt Graff
Ned Connor
Career
Per 9 Innings
7
0.98
Milt Graff
Career
Per 9 Innings
54
1.22
Ned Connor
Career
Per 9 Innings
7
0.98
Milt Graff
Career
Per 9 Innings
43
0.97
Ned Connor
Career
Per 9 Innings
50
7.03
Milt Graff
Career
Per 9 Innings
241
5.44
Ned Connor
Career
Per 9 Innings
41
5.77
Milt Graff
Career
Per 9 Innings
238
5.37
Ned Connor
Career
Per 9 Innings
82
82
Milt Graff
Career
Per 9 Innings
98.76
98.76
Ned Connor
Career
Per 9 Innings
5.857
5.857
Milt Graff
Career
Per 9 Innings
4.407
4.407
Ned Connor
Career
Per 9 Innings
100
100
Milt Graff
Career
Per 9 Innings
79.63
79.63
Ned Connor
Career
Per 9 Innings
1
0.14
Milt Graff
Career
Per 9 Innings
36
0.81