Ed Connolly vs. Frank Foreman — Career Comparison

Ed Connolly built a career as a starting pitcher and Frank Foreman as a reliever — different jobs with different demands — but on the metrics that apply to both, a comparison is still worth making. Frank Foreman posted stronger surface numbers — ERA 3.97 and WHIP 1.461 compared to 5.88 and 1.885 for Ed Connolly. By the career numbers, Frank Foreman had the better of this cross-role comparison — though era context would sharpen the verdict.