Peter Connell vs. Bill Smith — Career Comparison
On the career numbers, Peter Connell posted the stronger offensive profile against Bill Smith. Peter Connell posted stronger numbers in OPS (.597 vs .348) and on-base percentage (.308 vs .174). By the career numbers, Peter Connell had the stronger overall case — though those totals don't account for the eras and run environments each player worked in.
Hitting Stats for Peter Connell and Bill Smith
Peter Connell
Career
Per 600 PA
12
138.46
Bill Smith
Career
Per 600 PA
6
156.52
Peter Connell
Career
Per 600 PA
52
600
Bill Smith
Career
Per 600 PA
23
600
Peter Connell
Career
Per 600 PA
0.2
0.2
Bill Smith
Career
Per 600 PA
0.174
0.174
Peter Connell
Career
Per 600 PA
0.67
0.67
Bill Smith
Career
Per 600 PA
0.348
0.348
Peter Connell
Career
Per 600 PA
5.3
61.13
Bill Smith
Career
Per 600 PA
0.63
16.31
Peter Connell
Career
Per 600 PA
16
184.62
Bill Smith
Career
Per 600 PA
4
104.35
Peter Connell
Career
Per 600 PA
0.308
0.308
Bill Smith
Career
Per 600 PA
0.174
0.174
Peter Connell
Career
Per 600 PA
0.289
0.289
Bill Smith
Career
Per 600 PA
0.174
0.174
Peter Connell
Career
Per 600 PA
0.211
0.211
Bill Smith
Career
Per 600 PA
0.122
0.122
Peter Connell
Career
Per 600 PA
0.639
0.639
Bill Smith
Career
Per 600 PA
0.211
0.211
Peter Connell
Career
Per 600 PA
10
115.38
Bill Smith
Career
Per 600 PA
3
78.26
Peter Connell
Career
Per 600 PA
5.37
61.96
Bill Smith
Career
Per 600 PA
0.46
12.09
Fielding Stats for Peter Connell and Bill Smith
Peter Connell
Career
Per 9 Innings
12
1.05
Bill Smith
Career
Per 9 Innings
6
1.13
Peter Connell
Career
Per 9 Innings
309
27
Bill Smith
Career
Per 9 Innings
144
27
Peter Connell
Career
Per 9 Innings
103
9
Bill Smith
Career
Per 9 Innings
48
9
Peter Connell
Career
Per 9 Innings
56
4.89
Bill Smith
Career
Per 9 Innings
24
4.5
Peter Connell
Career
Per 9 Innings
47
4.11
Bill Smith
Career
Per 9 Innings
16
3
Peter Connell
Career
Per 9 Innings
83.93
83.93
Bill Smith
Career
Per 9 Innings
66.67
66.67
Peter Connell
Career
Per 9 Innings
3.917
3.917
Bill Smith
Career
Per 9 Innings
2.667
2.667