Gene Connell vs. Ed Goodson — Career Comparison
On the career numbers, Ed Goodson posted the stronger offensive profile against Gene Connell. Ed Goodson posted stronger numbers in OPS (.681 vs .500) and on-base percentage (.306 vs .250). By the career numbers, Ed Goodson had the stronger overall case — though those totals don't account for the eras and run environments each player worked in.
Hitting Stats for Gene Connell and Ed Goodson
Gene Connell
Career
Per 600 PA
12
600
Ed Goodson
Career
Per 600 PA
1345
600
Gene Connell
Career
Per 600 PA
0.25
0.25
Ed Goodson
Career
Per 600 PA
0.26
0.26
Gene Connell
Career
Per 600 PA
0.5
0.5
Ed Goodson
Career
Per 600 PA
0.681
0.681
Gene Connell
Career
Per 600 PA
0.68
34.02
Ed Goodson
Career
Per 600 PA
133.81
59.69
Gene Connell
Career
Per 600 PA
0.25
0.25
Ed Goodson
Career
Per 600 PA
0.297
0.297
Gene Connell
Career
Per 600 PA
0.25
0.25
Ed Goodson
Career
Per 600 PA
0.374
0.374
Gene Connell
Career
Per 600 PA
0.175
0.175
Ed Goodson
Career
Per 600 PA
0.227
0.227
Gene Connell
Career
Per 600 PA
0.333
0.333
Ed Goodson
Career
Per 600 PA
0.553
0.553
Gene Connell
Career
Per 600 PA
0.87
43.44
Ed Goodson
Career
Per 600 PA
138.15
61.63
Gene Connell
Career
Per 600 PA
4
4
Ed Goodson
Career
Per 600 PA
9.96
9.96
Gene Connell
Career
Per 600 PA
0
0
Ed Goodson
Career
Per 600 PA
44
19.63
Fielding Stats for Gene Connell and Ed Goodson
Gene Connell
Career
Per 9 Innings
6
Ed Goodson
Career
Per 9 Innings
314
1.2
Gene Connell
Career
Per 9 Innings
14
Ed Goodson
Career
Per 9 Innings
1736
6.62
Gene Connell
Career
Per 9 Innings
14
Ed Goodson
Career
Per 9 Innings
1694
6.46
Gene Connell
Career
Per 9 Innings
100
Ed Goodson
Career
Per 9 Innings
97.58
97.58
Gene Connell
Career
Per 9 Innings
2.333
Ed Goodson
Career
Per 9 Innings
5.395
5.395