Griffin Conine vs. Jim Riley — Career Comparison
On the career numbers, Griffin Conine posted the stronger offensive profile against Jim Riley. Griffin Conine posted stronger numbers in OPS (.755 vs .500) and slugging (.435 vs .000). Jim Riley had the advantage in on-base percentage (.500 vs .320). By the career numbers, Griffin Conine had the stronger overall case — though those totals don't account for the eras and run environments each player worked in.
Hitting Stats for Griffin Conine and Jim Riley
Griffin Conine
Career
Per 600 PA
175
600
Jim Riley
Career
Per 600 PA
2
600
Griffin Conine
Career
Per 600 PA
0.756
0.756
Jim Riley
Career
Per 600 PA
0.75
0.75
Griffin Conine
Career
Per 600 PA
22.49
77.1
Jim Riley
Career
Per 600 PA
0.1
29.73
Griffin Conine
Career
Per 600 PA
0.32
0.32
Jim Riley
Career
Per 600 PA
0.5
0.5
Griffin Conine
Career
Per 600 PA
0.253
0.253
Jim Riley
Career
Per 600 PA
0.225
0.225
Griffin Conine
Career
Per 600 PA
22.61
77.5
Jim Riley
Career
Per 600 PA
0.21
64.17
Griffin Conine
Career
Per 600 PA
3.3
3.3
Jim Riley
Career
Per 600 PA
2
2
Griffin Conine
Career
Per 600 PA
0.25
0.25
Jim Riley
Career
Per 600 PA
1
1
Griffin Conine
Career
Per 600 PA
1
3.43
Jim Riley
Career
Per 600 PA
0
0
Fielding Stats for Griffin Conine and Jim Riley
Griffin Conine
Career
Per 9 Innings
50
1.24
Jim Riley
Career
Per 9 Innings
1
1.8
Griffin Conine
Career
Per 9 Innings
41
1.02
Jim Riley
Career
Per 9 Innings
1
1.8
Griffin Conine
Career
Per 9 Innings
1086
27
Jim Riley
Career
Per 9 Innings
15
27
Griffin Conine
Career
Per 9 Innings
83
2.06
Jim Riley
Career
Per 9 Innings
5
9
Griffin Conine
Career
Per 9 Innings
82
2.04
Jim Riley
Career
Per 9 Innings
3
5.4
Griffin Conine
Career
Per 9 Innings
98.8
98.8
Jim Riley
Career
Per 9 Innings
60
60
Griffin Conine
Career
Per 9 Innings
1.64
1.64
Jim Riley
Career
Per 9 Innings
3
3
Griffin Conine
Career
Per 9 Innings
82
82
Jim Riley
Career
Per 9 Innings
100
100