Frank Colman vs. Ed Samcoff — Career Comparison
On the career numbers, Frank Colman posted the stronger offensive profile against Ed Samcoff. Frank Colman posted stronger numbers in OPS (.669 vs .083) and on-base percentage (.291 vs .083). By the career numbers, Frank Colman had the stronger overall case — though those totals don't account for the eras and run environments each player worked in.
Hitting Stats for Frank Colman and Ed Samcoff
Frank Colman
Career
Per 600 PA
624
600
Ed Samcoff
Career
Per 600 PA
12
600
Frank Colman
Career
Per 600 PA
0.68
0.68
Ed Samcoff
Career
Per 600 PA
0.125
0.125
Frank Colman
Career
Per 600 PA
0.291
0.291
Ed Samcoff
Career
Per 600 PA
0.083
0.083
Frank Colman
Career
Per 600 PA
0.226
0.226
Ed Samcoff
Career
Per 600 PA
0.038
0.038
Frank Colman
Career
Per 600 PA
0.593
0.593
Ed Samcoff
Career
Per 600 PA
0.091
0.091
Frank Colman
Career
Per 600 PA
9.45
9.45
Ed Samcoff
Career
Per 600 PA
6
6
Frank Colman
Career
Per 600 PA
0.74
0.74
Ed Samcoff
Career
Per 600 PA
0.5
0.5
Frank Colman
Career
Per 600 PA
9
8.65
Ed Samcoff
Career
Per 600 PA
0
0
Fielding Stats for Frank Colman and Ed Samcoff
Frank Colman
Career
Per 9 Innings
133
Ed Samcoff
Career
Per 9 Innings
3
Frank Colman
Career
Per 9 Innings
98.38
Ed Samcoff
Career
Per 9 Innings
100