Nat Collins vs. Jim McLeod — Career Comparison
Looking at the career totals, Nat Collins and Jim McLeod are closely matched on the surface stats. Nat Collins posted stronger numbers in OPS (.700 vs .485) and on-base percentage (.500 vs .248). Jim McLeod had the advantage in slugging (.237 vs .200). By the career numbers, Nat Collins had the stronger overall case — though those totals don't account for the eras and run environments each player worked in.
Hitting Stats for Nat Collins and Jim McLeod
Nat Collins
Career
Per 600 PA
0.2
0.2
Jim McLeod
Career
Per 600 PA
0.203
0.203
Nat Collins
Career
Per 600 PA
0.833
0.833
Jim McLeod
Career
Per 600 PA
0.516
0.516
Nat Collins
Career
Per 600 PA
4
266.67
Jim McLeod
Career
Per 600 PA
70
145.33
Nat Collins
Career
Per 600 PA
0.5
0.5
Jim McLeod
Career
Per 600 PA
0.248
0.248
Nat Collins
Career
Per 600 PA
0.2
0.2
Jim McLeod
Career
Per 600 PA
0.237
0.237
Nat Collins
Career
Per 600 PA
0.275
0.275
Jim McLeod
Career
Per 600 PA
0.171
0.171
Nat Collins
Career
Per 600 PA
1.25
83.08
Jim McLeod
Career
Per 600 PA
16.16
33.56
Nat Collins
Career
Per 600 PA
9
9
Jim McLeod
Career
Per 600 PA
9.63
9.63
Nat Collins
Career
Per 600 PA
3
3
Jim McLeod
Career
Per 600 PA
0.47
0.47
Fielding Stats for Nat Collins and Jim McLeod
Nat Collins
Career
Per 9 Innings
2
1.13
Jim McLeod
Career
Per 9 Innings
86
Nat Collins
Career
Per 9 Innings
9
5.06
Jim McLeod
Career
Per 9 Innings
210
Nat Collins
Career
Per 9 Innings
81.82
81.82
Jim McLeod
Career
Per 9 Innings
91.7
Nat Collins
Career
Per 9 Innings
4.5
4.5
Jim McLeod
Career
Per 9 Innings
2.442