Casey Coleman vs. Pete Hamm — Career Comparison

Looking at the career totals, Casey Coleman and Pete Hamm are fairly close on the surface numbers. Casey Coleman posted stronger numbers in ERA (5.72 vs 6.41) and home runs allowed (0.91 per nine innings vs 1.49). Pete Hamm had the advantage in WHIP (1.641 vs 1.717). By the career numbers, Casey Coleman had the better of this comparison — though ERA and WHIP alone don't account for era, park factors, or the defenses each pitcher worked behind.