Jim Cockman vs. Buck Danner — Career Comparison
On the career numbers, Buck Danner posted the stronger offensive profile against Jim Cockman. Buck Danner posted stronger numbers in OPS (.500 vs .296) and on-base percentage (.250 vs .190). By the career numbers, Buck Danner had the stronger overall case — though those totals don't account for the eras and run environments each player worked in.
Hitting Stats for Jim Cockman and Buck Danner
Jim Cockman
Career
Per 600 PA
42
600
Buck Danner
Career
Per 600 PA
12
600
Jim Cockman
Career
Per 600 PA
0.105
0.105
Buck Danner
Career
Per 600 PA
0.25
0.25
Jim Cockman
Career
Per 600 PA
0.375
0.375
Buck Danner
Career
Per 600 PA
0.568
0.568
Jim Cockman
Career
Per 600 PA
0.191
0.191
Buck Danner
Career
Per 600 PA
0.25
0.25
Jim Cockman
Career
Per 600 PA
0.105
0.105
Buck Danner
Career
Per 600 PA
0.25
0.25
Jim Cockman
Career
Per 600 PA
0.112
0.112
Buck Danner
Career
Per 600 PA
0.175
0.175
Jim Cockman
Career
Per 600 PA
0.294
0.294
Buck Danner
Career
Per 600 PA
0.444
0.444
Jim Cockman
Career
Per 600 PA
0.41
5.83
Buck Danner
Career
Per 600 PA
1.04
51.86
Jim Cockman
Career
Per 600 PA
4.2
4.2
Buck Danner
Career
Per 600 PA
12
12
Jim Cockman
Career
Per 600 PA
2
28.57
Buck Danner
Career
Per 600 PA
1
50
Jim Cockman
Career
Per 600 PA
100
100
Buck Danner
Career
Per 600 PA
100
100
Fielding Stats for Jim Cockman and Buck Danner
Jim Cockman
Career
Per 9 Innings
13
1.31
Buck Danner
Career
Per 9 Innings
3
Jim Cockman
Career
Per 9 Innings
28
2.83
Buck Danner
Career
Per 9 Innings
9
Jim Cockman
Career
Per 9 Innings
87.5
87.5
Buck Danner
Career
Per 9 Innings
75
Jim Cockman
Career
Per 9 Innings
2.154
2.154
Buck Danner
Career
Per 9 Innings
3