Jimmy Cockerham vs. Hal Quick — Career Comparison
On the career numbers, Jimmy Cockerham posted the stronger offensive profile against Hal Quick. Jimmy Cockerham posted stronger numbers in OPS (.650 vs .547) and on-base percentage (.400 vs .279). Hal Quick had the advantage in slugging (.268 vs .250). By the career numbers, Jimmy Cockerham had the stronger overall case — though those totals don't account for the eras and run environments each player worked in.
Hitting Stats for Jimmy Cockerham and Hal Quick
Jimmy Cockerham
Career
Per 600 PA
3
360
Hal Quick
Career
Per 600 PA
12
167.44
Jimmy Cockerham
Career
Per 600 PA
5
600
Hal Quick
Career
Per 600 PA
43
600
Jimmy Cockerham
Career
Per 600 PA
0.25
0.25
Hal Quick
Career
Per 600 PA
0.244
0.244
Jimmy Cockerham
Career
Per 600 PA
0.7
0.7
Hal Quick
Career
Per 600 PA
0.577
0.577
Jimmy Cockerham
Career
Per 600 PA
0.5
59.55
Hal Quick
Career
Per 600 PA
2.7
37.64
Jimmy Cockerham
Career
Per 600 PA
2
240
Hal Quick
Career
Per 600 PA
12
167.44
Jimmy Cockerham
Career
Per 600 PA
0.4
0.4
Hal Quick
Career
Per 600 PA
0.279
0.279
Jimmy Cockerham
Career
Per 600 PA
0.25
0.25
Hal Quick
Career
Per 600 PA
0.268
0.268
Jimmy Cockerham
Career
Per 600 PA
0.243
0.243
Hal Quick
Career
Per 600 PA
0.193
0.193
Jimmy Cockerham
Career
Per 600 PA
0.667
0.667
Hal Quick
Career
Per 600 PA
0.424
0.424
Jimmy Cockerham
Career
Per 600 PA
0.65
77.49
Hal Quick
Career
Per 600 PA
3.12
43.54
Jimmy Cockerham
Career
Per 600 PA
0
0
Hal Quick
Career
Per 600 PA
2
27.91
Fielding Stats for Jimmy Cockerham and Hal Quick
Jimmy Cockerham
Career
Per 9 Innings
3
2.45
Hal Quick
Career
Per 9 Innings
10
Jimmy Cockerham
Career
Per 9 Innings
10
8.18
Hal Quick
Career
Per 9 Innings
55
Jimmy Cockerham
Career
Per 9 Innings
9
7.36
Hal Quick
Career
Per 9 Innings
51
Jimmy Cockerham
Career
Per 9 Innings
90
90
Hal Quick
Career
Per 9 Innings
92.73