Jimmy Cockerham vs. Jim McLeod — Career Comparison
On the career numbers, Jimmy Cockerham posted the stronger offensive profile against Jim McLeod. Jimmy Cockerham posted stronger numbers in OPS (.650 vs .485) and on-base percentage (.400 vs .248). By the career numbers, Jimmy Cockerham had the stronger overall case — though those totals don't account for the eras and run environments each player worked in.
Hitting Stats for Jimmy Cockerham and Jim McLeod
Jimmy Cockerham
Career
Per 600 PA
5
600
Jim McLeod
Career
Per 600 PA
289
600
Jimmy Cockerham
Career
Per 600 PA
0.25
0.25
Jim McLeod
Career
Per 600 PA
0.203
0.203
Jimmy Cockerham
Career
Per 600 PA
0.7
0.7
Jim McLeod
Career
Per 600 PA
0.516
0.516
Jimmy Cockerham
Career
Per 600 PA
0.5
59.55
Jim McLeod
Career
Per 600 PA
15.2
31.55
Jimmy Cockerham
Career
Per 600 PA
2
240
Jim McLeod
Career
Per 600 PA
70
145.33
Jimmy Cockerham
Career
Per 600 PA
0.4
0.4
Jim McLeod
Career
Per 600 PA
0.248
0.248
Jimmy Cockerham
Career
Per 600 PA
0.25
0.25
Jim McLeod
Career
Per 600 PA
0.237
0.237
Jimmy Cockerham
Career
Per 600 PA
0.243
0.243
Jim McLeod
Career
Per 600 PA
0.171
0.171
Jimmy Cockerham
Career
Per 600 PA
0.667
0.667
Jim McLeod
Career
Per 600 PA
0.373
0.373
Jimmy Cockerham
Career
Per 600 PA
1
120
Jim McLeod
Career
Per 600 PA
40
83.04
Jimmy Cockerham
Career
Per 600 PA
0.65
77.49
Jim McLeod
Career
Per 600 PA
16.16
33.56
Jimmy Cockerham
Career
Per 600 PA
Jim McLeod
Career
Per 600 PA
9.63
9.63
Jimmy Cockerham
Career
Per 600 PA
0
0
Jim McLeod
Career
Per 600 PA
4
8.3
Fielding Stats for Jimmy Cockerham and Jim McLeod
Jimmy Cockerham
Career
Per 9 Innings
3
2.45
Jim McLeod
Career
Per 9 Innings
86
Jimmy Cockerham
Career
Per 9 Innings
10
8.18
Jim McLeod
Career
Per 9 Innings
229
Jimmy Cockerham
Career
Per 9 Innings
9
7.36
Jim McLeod
Career
Per 9 Innings
210
Jimmy Cockerham
Career
Per 9 Innings
90
90
Jim McLeod
Career
Per 9 Innings
91.7
Jimmy Cockerham
Career
Per 9 Innings
3
3
Jim McLeod
Career
Per 9 Innings
2.442