Jim Coates vs. Jim Todd — Career Comparison

Looking at the career totals, Jim Coates and Jim Todd are fairly close on the surface numbers. Jim Coates posted stronger numbers in ERA (4 vs 4.23) and WHIP (1.406 vs 1.587). Jim Todd had the advantage in home runs allowed (0.6 per nine innings vs 0.86). By the career numbers, Jim Coates had the better of this comparison — though ERA and WHIP alone don't account for era, park factors, or the defenses each pitcher worked behind.