Jim Clark vs. Chuck Corgan — Career Comparison
Looking at the career totals, Jim Clark and Chuck Corgan are closely matched on the surface stats. Chuck Corgan posted stronger numbers in OPS (.530 vs .500) and on-base percentage (.270 vs .250). Jim Clark had the advantage in batting average (.250 vs .221). By the career numbers, Chuck Corgan had the stronger overall case — though those totals don't account for the eras and run environments each player worked in.
Hitting Stats for Jim Clark and Chuck Corgan
Jim Clark
Career
Per 600 PA
12
600
Chuck Corgan
Career
Per 600 PA
113
600
Jim Clark
Career
Per 600 PA
0.25
0.25
Chuck Corgan
Career
Per 600 PA
0.221
0.221
Jim Clark
Career
Per 600 PA
0.5
0.5
Chuck Corgan
Career
Per 600 PA
0.553
0.553
Jim Clark
Career
Per 600 PA
0.25
0.25
Chuck Corgan
Career
Per 600 PA
0.27
0.27
Jim Clark
Career
Per 600 PA
0.25
0.25
Chuck Corgan
Career
Per 600 PA
0.26
0.26
Jim Clark
Career
Per 600 PA
0.175
0.175
Chuck Corgan
Career
Per 600 PA
0.187
0.187
Jim Clark
Career
Per 600 PA
0.333
0.333
Chuck Corgan
Career
Per 600 PA
0.42
0.42
Jim Clark
Career
Per 600 PA
0.88
44.03
Chuck Corgan
Career
Per 600 PA
8.74
46.4
Jim Clark
Career
Per 600 PA
6
6
Chuck Corgan
Career
Per 600 PA
8.69
8.69
Fielding Stats for Jim Clark and Chuck Corgan
Jim Clark
Career
Per 9 Innings
2
Chuck Corgan
Career
Per 9 Innings
30
Jim Clark
Career
Per 9 Innings
100
Chuck Corgan
Career
Per 9 Innings
92.73