Darryl Cias vs. Mickey Heath — Career Comparison
On the career numbers, Darryl Cias posted the stronger offensive profile against Mickey Heath. Darryl Cias posted stronger numbers in OPS (.789 vs .568) and on-base percentage (.400 vs .311). By the career numbers, Darryl Cias had the stronger overall case — though those totals don't account for the eras and run environments each player worked in.
Hitting Stats for Darryl Cias and Mickey Heath
Darryl Cias
Career
Per 600 PA
19
570
Mickey Heath
Career
Per 600 PA
46
147.59
Darryl Cias
Career
Per 600 PA
20
600
Mickey Heath
Career
Per 600 PA
187
600
Darryl Cias
Career
Per 600 PA
0.333
0.333
Mickey Heath
Career
Per 600 PA
0.213
0.213
Darryl Cias
Career
Per 600 PA
0.836
0.836
Mickey Heath
Career
Per 600 PA
0.607
0.607
Darryl Cias
Career
Per 600 PA
0.167
0.167
Mickey Heath
Career
Per 600 PA
0.118
0.118
Darryl Cias
Career
Per 600 PA
3.21
96.22
Mickey Heath
Career
Per 600 PA
14.56
46.72
Darryl Cias
Career
Per 600 PA
0.4
0.4
Mickey Heath
Career
Per 600 PA
0.312
0.312
Darryl Cias
Career
Per 600 PA
0.389
0.389
Mickey Heath
Career
Per 600 PA
0.256
0.256
Darryl Cias
Career
Per 600 PA
0.056
0.056
Mickey Heath
Career
Per 600 PA
0.044
0.044
Darryl Cias
Career
Per 600 PA
0.277
0.277
Mickey Heath
Career
Per 600 PA
0.204
0.204
Darryl Cias
Career
Per 600 PA
0.833
0.833
Mickey Heath
Career
Per 600 PA
0.508
0.508
Darryl Cias
Career
Per 600 PA
3.42
102.62
Mickey Heath
Career
Per 600 PA
17.06
54.74
Darryl Cias
Career
Per 600 PA
5
5
Mickey Heath
Career
Per 600 PA
6.68
6.68
Darryl Cias
Career
Per 600 PA
0.5
0.5
Mickey Heath
Career
Per 600 PA
0.79
0.79
Fielding Stats for Darryl Cias and Mickey Heath
Darryl Cias
Career
Per 9 Innings
19
2.67
Mickey Heath
Career
Per 9 Innings
46
Darryl Cias
Career
Per 9 Innings
30
4.22
Mickey Heath
Career
Per 9 Innings
494
Darryl Cias
Career
Per 9 Innings
29
4.08
Mickey Heath
Career
Per 9 Innings
490
Darryl Cias
Career
Per 9 Innings
96.67
96.67
Mickey Heath
Career
Per 9 Innings
99.19
Darryl Cias
Career
Per 9 Innings
1.526
1.526
Mickey Heath
Career
Per 9 Innings
10.652