John Chisum vs. Jim McLeod — Career Comparison
On the career numbers, John Chisum posted the stronger offensive profile against Jim McLeod. John Chisum posted stronger numbers in on-base percentage (.261 vs .248) and batting average (.227 vs .203). By the career numbers, John Chisum had the stronger overall case — though those totals don't account for the eras and run environments each player worked in.
Hitting Stats for John Chisum and Jim McLeod
John Chisum
Career
Per 600 PA
24
600
Jim McLeod
Career
Per 600 PA
289
600
John Chisum
Career
Per 600 PA
0.227
0.227
Jim McLeod
Career
Per 600 PA
0.203
0.203
John Chisum
Career
Per 600 PA
0.521
0.521
Jim McLeod
Career
Per 600 PA
0.516
0.516
John Chisum
Career
Per 600 PA
0.261
0.261
Jim McLeod
Career
Per 600 PA
0.248
0.248
John Chisum
Career
Per 600 PA
0.227
0.227
Jim McLeod
Career
Per 600 PA
0.237
0.237
John Chisum
Career
Per 600 PA
0.174
0.174
Jim McLeod
Career
Per 600 PA
0.171
0.171
John Chisum
Career
Per 600 PA
0.353
0.353
Jim McLeod
Career
Per 600 PA
0.373
0.373
John Chisum
Career
Per 600 PA
1.64
40.88
Jim McLeod
Career
Per 600 PA
16.16
33.56
John Chisum
Career
Per 600 PA
8
8
Jim McLeod
Career
Per 600 PA
9.63
9.63
John Chisum
Career
Per 600 PA
0.33
0.33
Jim McLeod
Career
Per 600 PA
0.47
0.47
Fielding Stats for John Chisum and Jim McLeod
John Chisum
Career
Per 9 Innings
7
1.2
Jim McLeod
Career
Per 9 Innings
86
John Chisum
Career
Per 9 Innings
13
2.22
Jim McLeod
Career
Per 9 Innings
210
John Chisum
Career
Per 9 Innings
76.47
76.47
Jim McLeod
Career
Per 9 Innings
91.7
John Chisum
Career
Per 9 Innings
1.857
1.857
Jim McLeod
Career
Per 9 Innings
2.442