Pete Childs vs. Unknown Proctor — Career Comparison
A full statistical comparison isn't possible here, but the available career numbers offer some indication. Unknown Proctor had the edge in on-base percentage (1.000 vs .292). By the career numbers, Unknown Proctor had the stronger overall case — though those totals don't account for the eras and run environments each player worked in.
Hitting Stats for Pete Childs and Unknown Proctor
Pete Childs
Career
Per 600 PA
212
162.45
Unknown Proctor
Career
Per 600 PA
1
600
Pete Childs
Career
Per 600 PA
783
600
Unknown Proctor
Career
Per 600 PA
1
600
Pete Childs
Career
Per 600 PA
0.569
0.569
Unknown Proctor
Career
Per 600 PA
1.5
1.5
Pete Childs
Career
Per 600 PA
225
172.41
Unknown Proctor
Career
Per 600 PA
1
600
Pete Childs
Career
Per 600 PA
0.292
0.292
Unknown Proctor
Career
Per 600 PA
1
1
Pete Childs
Career
Per 600 PA
0.189
0.189
Unknown Proctor
Career
Per 600 PA
Pete Childs
Career
Per 600 PA
62.93
48.22
Unknown Proctor
Career
Per 600 PA
0.34
205.73
Pete Childs
Career
Per 600 PA
12.63
12.63
Unknown Proctor
Career
Per 600 PA
Pete Childs
Career
Per 600 PA
0
0
Unknown Proctor
Career
Per 600 PA
0
0
Fielding Stats for Pete Childs and Unknown Proctor
Pete Childs
Career
Per 9 Innings
205
1.05
Unknown Proctor
Career
Per 9 Innings
1
3.86
Pete Childs
Career
Per 9 Innings
5277
27
Unknown Proctor
Career
Per 9 Innings
7
27
Pete Childs
Career
Per 9 Innings
1759
9
Unknown Proctor
Career
Per 9 Innings
2.1
9
Pete Childs
Career
Per 9 Innings
1034
5.29
Unknown Proctor
Career
Per 9 Innings
0
0
Pete Childs
Career
Per 9 Innings
94.43
94.43
Unknown Proctor
Career
Per 9 Innings
Pete Childs
Career
Per 9 Innings
0
0
Unknown Proctor
Career
Per 9 Innings
0
0