Tsung-Che Cheng vs. Jim Small — Career Comparison
On the career numbers, Jim Small posted the stronger offensive profile against Tsung-Che Cheng. Jim Small posted stronger numbers in OPS (.658 vs .000) and on-base percentage (.318 vs .000). By the career numbers, Jim Small had the stronger overall case — though those totals don't account for the eras and run environments each player worked in.
Hitting Stats for Tsung-Che Cheng and Jim Small
Tsung-Che Cheng
Career
Per 600 PA
3
257.14
Jim Small
Career
Per 600 PA
108
423.53
Tsung-Che Cheng
Career
Per 600 PA
7
600
Jim Small
Career
Per 600 PA
153
600
Tsung-Che Cheng
Career
Per 600 PA
0
0
Jim Small
Career
Per 600 PA
0.318
0.318
Tsung-Che Cheng
Career
Per 600 PA
0
0
Jim Small
Career
Per 600 PA
0.228
0.228
Tsung-Che Cheng
Career
Per 600 PA
2.33
2.33
Jim Small
Career
Per 600 PA
6.95
6.95
Tsung-Che Cheng
Career
Per 600 PA
0
0
Jim Small
Career
Per 600 PA
2
7.84
Tsung-Che Cheng
Career
Per 600 PA
1
85.71
Jim Small
Career
Per 600 PA
2
7.84
Tsung-Che Cheng
Career
Per 600 PA
1
85.71
Jim Small
Career
Per 600 PA
2
7.84
Fielding Stats for Tsung-Che Cheng and Jim Small
Tsung-Che Cheng
Career
Per 9 Innings
3
1.23
Jim Small
Career
Per 9 Innings
45
1.54
Tsung-Che Cheng
Career
Per 9 Innings
2
0.82
Jim Small
Career
Per 9 Innings
27
0.92
Tsung-Che Cheng
Career
Per 9 Innings
66
27
Jim Small
Career
Per 9 Innings
789
27
Tsung-Che Cheng
Career
Per 9 Innings
22
9
Jim Small
Career
Per 9 Innings
263
9
Tsung-Che Cheng
Career
Per 9 Innings
11
4.5
Jim Small
Career
Per 9 Innings
70
2.4
Tsung-Che Cheng
Career
Per 9 Innings
11
4.5
Jim Small
Career
Per 9 Innings
67
2.29
Tsung-Che Cheng
Career
Per 9 Innings
100
100
Jim Small
Career
Per 9 Innings
95.71
95.71
Tsung-Che Cheng
Career
Per 9 Innings
3.667
3.667
Jim Small
Career
Per 9 Innings
1.489
1.489
Tsung-Che Cheng
Career
Per 9 Innings
66.67
66.67
Jim Small
Career
Per 9 Innings
60
60