Ed Chamberlain vs. Jim Thurman — Career Comparison
On the career numbers, Jim Thurman posted the stronger offensive profile against Ed Chamberlain. Jim Thurman posted stronger numbers in OPS (.143 vs .000) and on-base percentage (.143 vs .000). By the career numbers, Jim Thurman had the stronger overall case — though those totals don't account for the eras and run environments each player worked in.
Hitting Stats for Ed Chamberlain and Jim Thurman
Ed Chamberlain
Career
Per 600 PA
2
133.33
Jim Thurman
Career
Per 600 PA
3
257.14
Ed Chamberlain
Career
Per 600 PA
9
600
Jim Thurman
Career
Per 600 PA
7
600
Ed Chamberlain
Career
Per 600 PA
0.222
0.222
Jim Thurman
Career
Per 600 PA
0.214
0.214
Ed Chamberlain
Career
Per 600 PA
0
0
Jim Thurman
Career
Per 600 PA
0.143
0.143
Ed Chamberlain
Career
Per 600 PA
0
0
Jim Thurman
Career
Per 600 PA
0.064
0.064
Ed Chamberlain
Career
Per 600 PA
-0.67
-44.64
Jim Thurman
Career
Per 600 PA
-0.28
-24.41
Ed Chamberlain
Career
Per 600 PA
0
0
Jim Thurman
Career
Per 600 PA
0
0
Fielding Stats for Ed Chamberlain and Jim Thurman
Ed Chamberlain
Career
Per 9 Innings
2
1.13
Jim Thurman
Career
Per 9 Innings
4
2.4
Ed Chamberlain
Career
Per 9 Innings
2
1.13
Jim Thurman
Career
Per 9 Innings
1
0.6
Ed Chamberlain
Career
Per 9 Innings
48
27
Jim Thurman
Career
Per 9 Innings
45
27
Ed Chamberlain
Career
Per 9 Innings
16
9
Jim Thurman
Career
Per 9 Innings
15
9
Ed Chamberlain
Career
Per 9 Innings
19
10.69
Jim Thurman
Career
Per 9 Innings
3
1.8
Ed Chamberlain
Career
Per 9 Innings
26
14.63
Jim Thurman
Career
Per 9 Innings
5
3
Ed Chamberlain
Career
Per 9 Innings
23
12.94
Jim Thurman
Career
Per 9 Innings
5
3
Ed Chamberlain
Career
Per 9 Innings
88.46
88.46
Jim Thurman
Career
Per 9 Innings
100
100
Ed Chamberlain
Career
Per 9 Innings
11.5
11.5
Jim Thurman
Career
Per 9 Innings
1.25
1.25
Ed Chamberlain
Career
Per 9 Innings
100
100
Jim Thurman
Career
Per 9 Innings
25
25
Ed Chamberlain
Career
Per 9 Innings
0
0
Jim Thurman
Career
Per 9 Innings
0
0