Ed Chamberlain vs. John O'Connell — Career Comparison
On the career numbers, John O'Connell posted the stronger offensive profile against Ed Chamberlain. John O'Connell posted stronger numbers in OPS (.472 vs .000) and on-base percentage (.222 vs .000). By the career numbers, John O'Connell had the stronger overall case — though those totals don't account for the eras and run environments each player worked in.
Hitting Stats for Ed Chamberlain and John O'Connell
Ed Chamberlain
Career
Per 600 PA
2
133.33
John O'Connell
Career
Per 600 PA
3
200
Ed Chamberlain
Career
Per 600 PA
9
600
John O'Connell
Career
Per 600 PA
9
600
Ed Chamberlain
Career
Per 600 PA
7
466.67
John O'Connell
Career
Per 600 PA
8
533.33
Ed Chamberlain
Career
Per 600 PA
0.222
0.222
John O'Connell
Career
Per 600 PA
0.5
0.5
Ed Chamberlain
Career
Per 600 PA
0
0
John O'Connell
Career
Per 600 PA
0.222
0.222
Ed Chamberlain
Career
Per 600 PA
0
0
John O'Connell
Career
Per 600 PA
0.163
0.163
Ed Chamberlain
Career
Per 600 PA
2
133.33
John O'Connell
Career
Per 600 PA
1
66.67
Ed Chamberlain
Career
Per 600 PA
-0.67
-44.64
John O'Connell
Career
Per 600 PA
0.33
22.13
Ed Chamberlain
Career
Per 600 PA
3
3
John O'Connell
Career
Per 600 PA
9
9
Ed Chamberlain
Career
Per 600 PA
0
0
John O'Connell
Career
Per 600 PA
0
0
Fielding Stats for Ed Chamberlain and John O'Connell
Ed Chamberlain
Career
Per 9 Innings
2
1.13
John O'Connell
Career
Per 9 Innings
3
Ed Chamberlain
Career
Per 9 Innings
26
14.63
John O'Connell
Career
Per 9 Innings
10
Ed Chamberlain
Career
Per 9 Innings
23
12.94
John O'Connell
Career
Per 9 Innings
10
Ed Chamberlain
Career
Per 9 Innings
88.46
88.46
John O'Connell
Career
Per 9 Innings
100
Ed Chamberlain
Career
Per 9 Innings
11.5
11.5
John O'Connell
Career
Per 9 Innings
3.333
Ed Chamberlain
Career
Per 9 Innings
0
0
John O'Connell
Career
Per 9 Innings
0