Ed Chamberlain vs. Jim McLeod — Career Comparison
On the career numbers, Jim McLeod posted the stronger offensive profile against Ed Chamberlain. Jim McLeod posted stronger numbers in OPS (.485 vs .000) and on-base percentage (.248 vs .000). By the career numbers, Jim McLeod had the stronger overall case — though those totals don't account for the eras and run environments each player worked in.
Hitting Stats for Ed Chamberlain and Jim McLeod
Ed Chamberlain
Career
Per 600 PA
2
133.33
Jim McLeod
Career
Per 600 PA
92
191
Ed Chamberlain
Career
Per 600 PA
9
600
Jim McLeod
Career
Per 600 PA
289
600
Ed Chamberlain
Career
Per 600 PA
0.222
0.222
Jim McLeod
Career
Per 600 PA
0.516
0.516
Ed Chamberlain
Career
Per 600 PA
0
0
Jim McLeod
Career
Per 600 PA
0.248
0.248
Ed Chamberlain
Career
Per 600 PA
0
0
Jim McLeod
Career
Per 600 PA
0.171
0.171
Ed Chamberlain
Career
Per 600 PA
2
133.33
Jim McLeod
Career
Per 600 PA
40
83.04
Ed Chamberlain
Career
Per 600 PA
3
3
Jim McLeod
Career
Per 600 PA
9.63
9.63
Ed Chamberlain
Career
Per 600 PA
2
133.33
Jim McLeod
Career
Per 600 PA
7
14.53
Ed Chamberlain
Career
Per 600 PA
0
0
Jim McLeod
Career
Per 600 PA
4
8.3
Fielding Stats for Ed Chamberlain and Jim McLeod
Ed Chamberlain
Career
Per 9 Innings
2
1.13
Jim McLeod
Career
Per 9 Innings
86
Ed Chamberlain
Career
Per 9 Innings
26
14.63
Jim McLeod
Career
Per 9 Innings
229
Ed Chamberlain
Career
Per 9 Innings
23
12.94
Jim McLeod
Career
Per 9 Innings
210
Ed Chamberlain
Career
Per 9 Innings
88.46
88.46
Jim McLeod
Career
Per 9 Innings
91.7
Ed Chamberlain
Career
Per 9 Innings
11.5
11.5
Jim McLeod
Career
Per 9 Innings
2.442