Ed Chamberlain vs. Jim Field — Career Comparison
On the career numbers, Jim Field posted the stronger offensive profile against Ed Chamberlain. Jim Field posted stronger numbers in OPS (.605 vs .000) and on-base percentage (.289 vs .000). By the career numbers, Jim Field had the stronger overall case — though those totals don't account for the eras and run environments each player worked in.
Hitting Stats for Ed Chamberlain and Jim Field
Ed Chamberlain
Career
Per 600 PA
2
133.33
Jim Field
Career
Per 600 PA
331
144.44
Ed Chamberlain
Career
Per 600 PA
9
600
Jim Field
Career
Per 600 PA
1375
600
Ed Chamberlain
Career
Per 600 PA
0.222
0.222
Jim Field
Career
Per 600 PA
0.625
0.625
Ed Chamberlain
Career
Per 600 PA
0
0
Jim Field
Career
Per 600 PA
0.289
0.289
Ed Chamberlain
Career
Per 600 PA
0
0
Jim Field
Career
Per 600 PA
0.209
0.209
Ed Chamberlain
Career
Per 600 PA
3
3
Jim Field
Career
Per 600 PA
1375
1375
Fielding Stats for Ed Chamberlain and Jim Field
Ed Chamberlain
Career
Per 9 Innings
2
1.13
Jim Field
Career
Per 9 Innings
332
1.03
Ed Chamberlain
Career
Per 9 Innings
48
27
Jim Field
Career
Per 9 Innings
8673
27
Ed Chamberlain
Career
Per 9 Innings
16
9
Jim Field
Career
Per 9 Innings
2891
9
Ed Chamberlain
Career
Per 9 Innings
19
10.69
Jim Field
Career
Per 9 Innings
3436
10.7
Ed Chamberlain
Career
Per 9 Innings
26
14.63
Jim Field
Career
Per 9 Innings
3677
11.45
Ed Chamberlain
Career
Per 9 Innings
23
12.94
Jim Field
Career
Per 9 Innings
3516
10.95
Ed Chamberlain
Career
Per 9 Innings
88.46
88.46
Jim Field
Career
Per 9 Innings
95.62
95.62
Ed Chamberlain
Career
Per 9 Innings
11.5
11.5
Jim Field
Career
Per 9 Innings
10.59
10.59
Ed Chamberlain
Career
Per 9 Innings
1
0.56
Jim Field
Career
Per 9 Innings
174
0.54