Harry Catto vs. Jim McLeod — Career Comparison
On the career numbers, Harry Catto posted the stronger offensive profile against Jim McLeod. Harry Catto posted stronger numbers in OPS (.857 vs .485) and on-base percentage (.429 vs .248). By the career numbers, Harry Catto had the stronger overall case — though those totals don't account for the eras and run environments each player worked in.
Hitting Stats for Harry Catto and Jim McLeod
Harry Catto
Career
Per 600 PA
0.429
0.429
Jim McLeod
Career
Per 600 PA
0.203
0.203
Harry Catto
Career
Per 600 PA
0.955
0.955
Jim McLeod
Career
Per 600 PA
0.516
0.516
Harry Catto
Career
Per 600 PA
1.43
122.34
Jim McLeod
Career
Per 600 PA
15.2
31.55
Harry Catto
Career
Per 600 PA
3
257.14
Jim McLeod
Career
Per 600 PA
70
145.33
Harry Catto
Career
Per 600 PA
0.429
0.429
Jim McLeod
Career
Per 600 PA
0.248
0.248
Harry Catto
Career
Per 600 PA
0.429
0.429
Jim McLeod
Career
Per 600 PA
0.237
0.237
Harry Catto
Career
Per 600 PA
0.3
0.3
Jim McLeod
Career
Per 600 PA
0.171
0.171
Harry Catto
Career
Per 600 PA
1.62
138.91
Jim McLeod
Career
Per 600 PA
16.16
33.56
Harry Catto
Career
Per 600 PA
7
7
Jim McLeod
Career
Per 600 PA
9.63
9.63
Harry Catto
Career
Per 600 PA
1
85.71
Jim McLeod
Career
Per 600 PA
3
6.23
Harry Catto
Career
Per 600 PA
100
100
Jim McLeod
Career
Per 600 PA
66.67
66.67
Fielding Stats for Harry Catto and Jim McLeod
Harry Catto
Career
Per 9 Innings
4
2.12
Jim McLeod
Career
Per 9 Innings
86
Harry Catto
Career
Per 9 Innings
7
3.71
Jim McLeod
Career
Per 9 Innings
210
Harry Catto
Career
Per 9 Innings
100
100
Jim McLeod
Career
Per 9 Innings
91.7
Harry Catto
Career
Per 9 Innings
1.75
1.75
Jim McLeod
Career
Per 9 Innings
2.442