Paul Castner vs. Scott Rice — Career Comparison

Looking at the career totals, Paul Castner and Scott Rice are fairly close on the surface numbers. Scott Rice posted stronger numbers in ERA (4.18 vs 6.3) and WHIP (1.562 vs 1.900). Paul Castner had the advantage in home runs allowed (0 per nine innings vs 0.28). By the career numbers, Scott Rice had the better of this comparison — though ERA and WHIP alone don't account for era, park factors, or the defenses each pitcher worked behind.