Paul Castner vs. Angel Nesbitt — Career Comparison

Looking at the career totals, Paul Castner and Angel Nesbitt are fairly close on the surface numbers. Angel Nesbitt posted stronger numbers in ERA (5.4 vs 6.3) and WHIP (1.477 vs 1.900). Paul Castner had the advantage in home runs allowed (0 per nine innings vs 0.83). By the career numbers, Angel Nesbitt had the better of this comparison — though ERA and WHIP alone don't account for era, park factors, or the defenses each pitcher worked behind.