Ed Caskin vs. John Rudderham — Career Comparison
On the career numbers, Ed Caskin posted the stronger offensive profile against John Rudderham. Ed Caskin posted stronger numbers in OPS (.529 vs .500) and on-base percentage (.261 vs .250). John Rudderham had the advantage in batting average (.250 vs .228). By the career numbers, Ed Caskin had the stronger overall case — though those totals don't account for the eras and run environments each player worked in.
Hitting Stats for Ed Caskin and John Rudderham
Ed Caskin
Career
Per 600 PA
482
148.08
John Rudderham
Career
Per 600 PA
1
150
Ed Caskin
Career
Per 600 PA
1953
600
John Rudderham
Career
Per 600 PA
4
600
Ed Caskin
Career
Per 600 PA
0.228
0.228
John Rudderham
Career
Per 600 PA
0.25
0.25
Ed Caskin
Career
Per 600 PA
0.539
0.539
John Rudderham
Career
Per 600 PA
0.5
0.5
Ed Caskin
Career
Per 600 PA
131.47
40.39
John Rudderham
Career
Per 600 PA
0.23
34.02
Ed Caskin
Career
Per 600 PA
509
156.37
John Rudderham
Career
Per 600 PA
1
150
Ed Caskin
Career
Per 600 PA
0.261
0.261
John Rudderham
Career
Per 600 PA
0.25
0.25
Ed Caskin
Career
Per 600 PA
0.269
0.269
John Rudderham
Career
Per 600 PA
0.25
0.25
Ed Caskin
Career
Per 600 PA
0.185
0.185
John Rudderham
Career
Per 600 PA
0.175
0.175
Ed Caskin
Career
Per 600 PA
0.405
0.405
John Rudderham
Career
Per 600 PA
0.333
0.333
Ed Caskin
Career
Per 600 PA
150.38
46.2
John Rudderham
Career
Per 600 PA
0.3
45.21
Ed Caskin
Career
Per 600 PA
11.49
11.49
John Rudderham
Career
Per 600 PA
Fielding Stats for Ed Caskin and John Rudderham
Ed Caskin
Career
Per 9 Innings
487
1.03
John Rudderham
Career
Per 9 Innings
1
0.9
Ed Caskin
Career
Per 9 Innings
12762
27
John Rudderham
Career
Per 9 Innings
30
27
Ed Caskin
Career
Per 9 Innings
4254
9
John Rudderham
Career
Per 9 Innings
10
9
Ed Caskin
Career
Per 9 Innings
2534
5.36
John Rudderham
Career
Per 9 Innings
2
1.8
Ed Caskin
Career
Per 9 Innings
87.96
87.96
John Rudderham
Career
Per 9 Innings
0
0