Ed Caskin vs. Jim Gilman — Career Comparison
On the career numbers, Jim Gilman posted the stronger offensive profile against Ed Caskin. Jim Gilman posted stronger numbers in OPS (.571 vs .529) and on-base percentage (.286 vs .261). Ed Caskin had the advantage in home run production (2 career HR at a higher rate). By the career numbers, Jim Gilman had the stronger overall case — though those totals don't account for the eras and run environments each player worked in.
Hitting Stats for Ed Caskin and Jim Gilman
Ed Caskin
Career
Per 600 PA
0.228
0.228
Jim Gilman
Career
Per 600 PA
0.286
0.286
Ed Caskin
Career
Per 600 PA
0.539
0.539
Jim Gilman
Career
Per 600 PA
0.571
0.571
Ed Caskin
Career
Per 600 PA
0.261
0.261
Jim Gilman
Career
Per 600 PA
0.286
0.286
Ed Caskin
Career
Per 600 PA
0.269
0.269
Jim Gilman
Career
Per 600 PA
0.286
0.286
Ed Caskin
Career
Per 600 PA
0.185
0.185
Jim Gilman
Career
Per 600 PA
0.2
0.2
Ed Caskin
Career
Per 600 PA
150.38
46.2
Jim Gilman
Career
Per 600 PA
0.69
59.04
Ed Caskin
Career
Per 600 PA
11.49
11.49
Jim Gilman
Career
Per 600 PA
3.5
3.5
Fielding Stats for Ed Caskin and Jim Gilman
Ed Caskin
Career
Per 9 Innings
487
1.03
Jim Gilman
Career
Per 9 Innings
2
1.38
Ed Caskin
Career
Per 9 Innings
2534
5.36
Jim Gilman
Career
Per 9 Innings
6
4.15
Ed Caskin
Career
Per 9 Innings
2229
4.72
Jim Gilman
Career
Per 9 Innings
4
2.77
Ed Caskin
Career
Per 9 Innings
87.96
87.96
Jim Gilman
Career
Per 9 Innings
66.67
66.67
Ed Caskin
Career
Per 9 Innings
4.577
4.577
Jim Gilman
Career
Per 9 Innings
2
2