Dan Casey vs. Hunter Strickland — Career Comparison

Looking at the career totals, Dan Casey and Hunter Strickland are fairly close on the surface numbers. Dan Casey posted stronger numbers in ERA (3.18 vs 3.39) and home runs allowed (0.23 per nine innings vs 0.98). Hunter Strickland had the advantage in WHIP (1.253 vs 1.313). By the career numbers, Dan Casey had the better of this comparison — though ERA and WHIP alone don't account for era, park factors, or the defenses each pitcher worked behind.