Ed Carfrey vs. Jamie Nelson — Career Comparison
On the career numbers, Jamie Nelson posted the stronger offensive profile against Ed Carfrey. Jamie Nelson posted stronger numbers in OPS (.597 vs .500) and on-base percentage (.315 vs .250). Ed Carfrey had the advantage in batting average (.250 vs .219). By the career numbers, Jamie Nelson had the stronger overall case — though those totals don't account for the eras and run environments each player worked in.
Hitting Stats for Ed Carfrey and Jamie Nelson
Ed Carfrey
Career
Per 600 PA
4
600
Jamie Nelson
Career
Per 600 PA
111
600
Ed Carfrey
Career
Per 600 PA
0.25
0.25
Jamie Nelson
Career
Per 600 PA
0.219
0.219
Ed Carfrey
Career
Per 600 PA
0.5
0.5
Jamie Nelson
Career
Per 600 PA
0.643
0.643
Ed Carfrey
Career
Per 600 PA
0.23
34.02
Jamie Nelson
Career
Per 600 PA
9.23
49.91
Ed Carfrey
Career
Per 600 PA
0.25
0.25
Jamie Nelson
Career
Per 600 PA
0.309
0.309
Ed Carfrey
Career
Per 600 PA
0.25
0.25
Jamie Nelson
Career
Per 600 PA
0.281
0.281
Ed Carfrey
Career
Per 600 PA
0.175
0.175
Jamie Nelson
Career
Per 600 PA
0.209
0.209
Ed Carfrey
Career
Per 600 PA
0.333
0.333
Jamie Nelson
Career
Per 600 PA
0.557
0.557
Ed Carfrey
Career
Per 600 PA
0.3
45.21
Jamie Nelson
Career
Per 600 PA
9.58
51.79
Ed Carfrey
Career
Per 600 PA
Jamie Nelson
Career
Per 600 PA
9.25
9.25
Ed Carfrey
Career
Per 600 PA
0
0
Jamie Nelson
Career
Per 600 PA
2
10.81
Fielding Stats for Ed Carfrey and Jamie Nelson
Ed Carfrey
Career
Per 9 Innings
1
1
Jamie Nelson
Career
Per 9 Innings
39
1.21
Ed Carfrey
Career
Per 9 Innings
4
4
Jamie Nelson
Career
Per 9 Innings
223
6.94
Ed Carfrey
Career
Per 9 Innings
3
3
Jamie Nelson
Career
Per 9 Innings
218
6.79
Ed Carfrey
Career
Per 9 Innings
75
75
Jamie Nelson
Career
Per 9 Innings
97.76
97.76
Ed Carfrey
Career
Per 9 Innings
3
3
Jamie Nelson
Career
Per 9 Innings
5.59
5.59
Ed Carfrey
Career
Per 9 Innings
0
0
Jamie Nelson
Career
Per 9 Innings
16
0.5