Jim Callahan vs. Vernon Riddick — Career Comparison
On the career numbers, Vernon Riddick posted the stronger offensive profile against Jim Callahan. Vernon Riddick posted stronger numbers in OPS (.429 vs .200) and slugging (.238 vs .000). Jim Callahan had the advantage in on-base percentage (.200 vs .190). By the career numbers, Vernon Riddick had the stronger overall case — though those totals don't account for the eras and run environments each player worked in.
Hitting Stats for Jim Callahan and Vernon Riddick
Jim Callahan
Career
Per 600 PA
5
600
Vernon Riddick
Career
Per 600 PA
42
600
Jim Callahan
Career
Per 600 PA
0.3
0.3
Vernon Riddick
Career
Per 600 PA
0.429
0.429
Jim Callahan
Career
Per 600 PA
0.03
3.21
Vernon Riddick
Career
Per 600 PA
1.84
26.21
Jim Callahan
Career
Per 600 PA
1
120
Vernon Riddick
Career
Per 600 PA
8
114.29
Jim Callahan
Career
Per 600 PA
0.2
0.2
Vernon Riddick
Career
Per 600 PA
0.191
0.191
Jim Callahan
Career
Per 600 PA
0.09
0.09
Vernon Riddick
Career
Per 600 PA
0.145
0.145
Jim Callahan
Career
Per 600 PA
0.25
0.25
Vernon Riddick
Career
Per 600 PA
0.294
0.294
Jim Callahan
Career
Per 600 PA
-0.12
-14.11
Vernon Riddick
Career
Per 600 PA
1.59
22.67
Jim Callahan
Career
Per 600 PA
1.67
1.67
Vernon Riddick
Career
Per 600 PA
42
42
Jim Callahan
Career
Per 600 PA
0
0
Vernon Riddick
Career
Per 600 PA
0
0
Fielding Stats for Jim Callahan and Vernon Riddick
Jim Callahan
Career
Per 9 Innings
1
9
Vernon Riddick
Career
Per 9 Innings
13
1.3
Jim Callahan
Career
Per 9 Innings
3
27
Vernon Riddick
Career
Per 9 Innings
270
27
Jim Callahan
Career
Per 9 Innings
1
9
Vernon Riddick
Career
Per 9 Innings
90
9
Jim Callahan
Career
Per 9 Innings
Vernon Riddick
Career
Per 9 Innings
98.04
98.04
Jim Callahan
Career
Per 9 Innings
0
0
Vernon Riddick
Career
Per 9 Innings
92.31
92.31
Jim Callahan
Career
Per 9 Innings
0
0
Vernon Riddick
Career
Per 9 Innings
0
0