Jim Byrnes vs. Unknown Proctor — Career Comparison
A full statistical comparison isn't possible here, but the available career numbers offer some indication. Unknown Proctor had the edge in on-base percentage (1.000 vs .174). By the career numbers, Unknown Proctor had the stronger overall case — though those totals don't account for the eras and run environments each player worked in.
Hitting Stats for Jim Byrnes and Unknown Proctor
Jim Byrnes
Career
Per 600 PA
10
260.87
Unknown Proctor
Career
Per 600 PA
1
600
Jim Byrnes
Career
Per 600 PA
23
600
Unknown Proctor
Career
Per 600 PA
1
600
Jim Byrnes
Career
Per 600 PA
0.435
0.435
Unknown Proctor
Career
Per 600 PA
1.5
1.5
Jim Byrnes
Career
Per 600 PA
4
104.35
Unknown Proctor
Career
Per 600 PA
1
600
Jim Byrnes
Career
Per 600 PA
0.174
0.174
Unknown Proctor
Career
Per 600 PA
1
1
Jim Byrnes
Career
Per 600 PA
0.144
0.144
Unknown Proctor
Career
Per 600 PA
Jim Byrnes
Career
Per 600 PA
0.97
25.29
Unknown Proctor
Career
Per 600 PA
0.34
205.73
Jim Byrnes
Career
Per 600 PA
0
0
Unknown Proctor
Career
Per 600 PA
0
0
Fielding Stats for Jim Byrnes and Unknown Proctor
Jim Byrnes
Career
Per 9 Innings
9
1.72
Unknown Proctor
Career
Per 9 Innings
1
3.86
Jim Byrnes
Career
Per 9 Innings
141
27
Unknown Proctor
Career
Per 9 Innings
7
27
Jim Byrnes
Career
Per 9 Innings
47
9
Unknown Proctor
Career
Per 9 Innings
2.1
9
Jim Byrnes
Career
Per 9 Innings
88.89
88.89
Unknown Proctor
Career
Per 9 Innings
Jim Byrnes
Career
Per 9 Innings
33.33
33.33
Unknown Proctor
Career
Per 9 Innings
0
0
Jim Byrnes
Career
Per 9 Innings
14
2.68
Unknown Proctor
Career
Per 9 Innings
0
0
Jim Byrnes
Career
Per 9 Innings
7
1.34
Unknown Proctor
Career
Per 9 Innings
0
0