Ed Busch vs. Jim O'Neill — Career Comparison
On the career numbers, Jim O'Neill posted the stronger offensive profile against Ed Busch. Jim O'Neill posted stronger numbers in OPS (.715 vs .608) and on-base percentage (.321 vs .311). By the career numbers, Jim O'Neill had the stronger overall case — though those totals don't account for the eras and run environments each player worked in.
Hitting Stats for Ed Busch and Jim O'Neill
Ed Busch
Career
Per 600 PA
1000
600
Jim O'Neill
Career
Per 600 PA
354
600
Ed Busch
Career
Per 600 PA
0.262
0.262
Jim O'Neill
Career
Per 600 PA
0.288
0.288
Ed Busch
Career
Per 600 PA
0.63
0.63
Jim O'Neill
Career
Per 600 PA
0.738
0.738
Ed Busch
Career
Per 600 PA
0.113
0.113
Jim O'Neill
Career
Per 600 PA
0.277
0.277
Ed Busch
Career
Per 600 PA
0.311
0.311
Jim O'Neill
Career
Per 600 PA
0.321
0.321
Ed Busch
Career
Per 600 PA
0.298
0.298
Jim O'Neill
Career
Per 600 PA
0.395
0.395
Ed Busch
Career
Per 600 PA
0.036
0.036
Jim O'Neill
Career
Per 600 PA
0.107
0.107
Ed Busch
Career
Per 600 PA
0.214
0.214
Jim O'Neill
Career
Per 600 PA
0.243
0.243
Ed Busch
Career
Per 600 PA
0.482
0.482
Jim O'Neill
Career
Per 600 PA
0.644
0.644
Ed Busch
Career
Per 600 PA
92.31
55.39
Jim O'Neill
Career
Per 600 PA
46.04
78.04
Ed Busch
Career
Per 600 PA
35.71
35.71
Jim O'Neill
Career
Per 600 PA
10.73
10.73
Ed Busch
Career
Per 600 PA
2.21
2.21
Jim O'Neill
Career
Per 600 PA
0.42
0.42
Ed Busch
Career
Per 600 PA
14
8.4
Jim O'Neill
Career
Per 600 PA
10
16.95
Ed Busch
Career
Per 600 PA
50
50
Jim O'Neill
Career
Per 600 PA
70
70
Fielding Stats for Ed Busch and Jim O'Neill
Ed Busch
Career
Per 9 Innings
267
Jim O'Neill
Career
Per 9 Innings
96
Ed Busch
Career
Per 9 Innings
94.54
Jim O'Neill
Career
Per 9 Innings
94.21