Jim Busby vs. Sal Fasano — Career Comparison
On the career numbers, Sal Fasano posted the stronger offensive profile against Jim Busby. Sal Fasano posted stronger numbers in OPS (.688 vs .500) and on-base percentage (.296 vs .250). Jim Busby had the advantage in batting average (.250 vs .221). By the career numbers, Sal Fasano had the stronger overall case — though those totals don't account for the eras and run environments each player worked in.
Hitting Stats for Jim Busby and Sal Fasano
Jim Busby
Career
Per 600 PA
0.25
0.25
Sal Fasano
Career
Per 600 PA
0.221
0.221
Jim Busby
Career
Per 600 PA
0.5
0.5
Sal Fasano
Career
Per 600 PA
0.703
0.703
Jim Busby
Career
Per 600 PA
0.25
0.25
Sal Fasano
Career
Per 600 PA
0.295
0.295
Jim Busby
Career
Per 600 PA
0.25
0.25
Sal Fasano
Career
Per 600 PA
0.392
0.392
Jim Busby
Career
Per 600 PA
0.175
0.175
Sal Fasano
Career
Per 600 PA
0.231
0.231
Jim Busby
Career
Per 600 PA
0.333
0.333
Sal Fasano
Career
Per 600 PA
0.623
0.623
Jim Busby
Career
Per 600 PA
0.6
45.21
Sal Fasano
Career
Per 600 PA
127.99
61.68
Jim Busby
Career
Per 600 PA
0
0
Sal Fasano
Career
Per 600 PA
26
12.53
Fielding Stats for Jim Busby and Sal Fasano
Jim Busby
Career
Per 9 Innings
3
1.69
Sal Fasano
Career
Per 9 Innings
423
1.26
Jim Busby
Career
Per 9 Innings
2
1.13
Sal Fasano
Career
Per 9 Innings
340
1.01
Jim Busby
Career
Per 9 Innings
9
5.06
Sal Fasano
Career
Per 9 Innings
2402
7.14
Jim Busby
Career
Per 9 Innings
9
5.06
Sal Fasano
Career
Per 9 Innings
2371
7.05
Jim Busby
Career
Per 9 Innings
100
100
Sal Fasano
Career
Per 9 Innings
98.71
98.71
Jim Busby
Career
Per 9 Innings
3
3
Sal Fasano
Career
Per 9 Innings
5.605
5.605
Jim Busby
Career
Per 9 Innings
66.67
66.67
Sal Fasano
Career
Per 9 Innings
80.38
80.38