Pete Burns vs. Jim McLeod — Career Comparison
On the career numbers, Pete Burns posted the stronger offensive profile against Jim McLeod. Pete Burns posted stronger numbers in OPS (.718 vs .485) and on-base percentage (.385 vs .248). By the career numbers, Pete Burns had the stronger overall case — though those totals don't account for the eras and run environments each player worked in.
Hitting Stats for Pete Burns and Jim McLeod
Pete Burns
Career
Per 600 PA
0.333
0.333
Jim McLeod
Career
Per 600 PA
0.203
0.203
Pete Burns
Career
Per 600 PA
0.759
0.759
Jim McLeod
Career
Per 600 PA
0.516
0.516
Pete Burns
Career
Per 600 PA
0.385
0.385
Jim McLeod
Career
Per 600 PA
0.248
0.248
Pete Burns
Career
Per 600 PA
0.333
0.333
Jim McLeod
Career
Per 600 PA
0.237
0.237
Pete Burns
Career
Per 600 PA
0.256
0.256
Jim McLeod
Career
Per 600 PA
0.171
0.171
Pete Burns
Career
Per 600 PA
0.625
0.625
Jim McLeod
Career
Per 600 PA
0.373
0.373
Pete Burns
Career
Per 600 PA
4.11
85.04
Jim McLeod
Career
Per 600 PA
16.16
33.56
Fielding Stats for Pete Burns and Jim McLeod
Pete Burns
Career
Per 9 Innings
7
1.02
Jim McLeod
Career
Per 9 Innings
86
Pete Burns
Career
Per 9 Innings
43
6.24
Jim McLeod
Career
Per 9 Innings
210
Pete Burns
Career
Per 9 Innings
93.48
93.48
Jim McLeod
Career
Per 9 Innings
91.7
Pete Burns
Career
Per 9 Innings
6.143
6.143
Jim McLeod
Career
Per 9 Innings
2.442