Pete Burns vs. Liz Funk — Career Comparison
Looking at the career totals, Pete Burns and Liz Funk are closely matched on the surface stats. Pete Burns posted stronger numbers in OPS (.718 vs .688) and on-base percentage (.385 vs .322). Liz Funk had the advantage in slugging (.367 vs .333). By the career numbers, Pete Burns had the stronger overall case — though those totals don't account for the eras and run environments each player worked in.
Hitting Stats for Pete Burns and Liz Funk
Pete Burns
Career
Per 600 PA
0.333
0.333
Liz Funk
Career
Per 600 PA
0.267
0.267
Pete Burns
Career
Per 600 PA
0.759
0.759
Liz Funk
Career
Per 600 PA
0.714
0.714
Pete Burns
Career
Per 600 PA
0.385
0.385
Liz Funk
Career
Per 600 PA
0.322
0.322
Pete Burns
Career
Per 600 PA
0.333
0.333
Liz Funk
Career
Per 600 PA
0.367
0.367
Pete Burns
Career
Per 600 PA
0.256
0.256
Liz Funk
Career
Per 600 PA
0.236
0.236
Pete Burns
Career
Per 600 PA
0.625
0.625
Liz Funk
Career
Per 600 PA
0.632
0.632
Pete Burns
Career
Per 600 PA
4.11
85.04
Liz Funk
Career
Per 600 PA
129.25
71.28
Fielding Stats for Pete Burns and Liz Funk
Pete Burns
Career
Per 9 Innings
7
1.02
Liz Funk
Career
Per 9 Innings
251
Pete Burns
Career
Per 9 Innings
93.48
93.48
Liz Funk
Career
Per 9 Innings
97.2
Pete Burns
Career
Per 9 Innings
6.143
6.143
Liz Funk
Career
Per 9 Innings
2.769