Pete Burns vs. Lou Dials — Career Comparison
Looking at the career totals, Pete Burns and Lou Dials are closely matched on the surface stats. Lou Dials posted stronger numbers in OPS (.737 vs .718) and slugging (.399 vs .333). Pete Burns had the advantage in on-base percentage (.385 vs .338). By the career numbers, Lou Dials had the stronger overall case — though those totals don't account for the eras and run environments each player worked in.
Hitting Stats for Pete Burns and Lou Dials
Pete Burns
Career
Per 600 PA
0.333
0.333
Lou Dials
Career
Per 600 PA
0.271
0.271
Pete Burns
Career
Per 600 PA
0.759
0.759
Lou Dials
Career
Per 600 PA
0.767
0.767
Pete Burns
Career
Per 600 PA
0.385
0.385
Lou Dials
Career
Per 600 PA
0.338
0.338
Pete Burns
Career
Per 600 PA
0.333
0.333
Lou Dials
Career
Per 600 PA
0.399
0.399
Pete Burns
Career
Per 600 PA
0.256
0.256
Lou Dials
Career
Per 600 PA
0.252
0.252
Pete Burns
Career
Per 600 PA
0.625
0.625
Lou Dials
Career
Per 600 PA
0.715
0.715
Pete Burns
Career
Per 600 PA
4.11
85.04
Lou Dials
Career
Per 600 PA
90.18
83.63
Fielding Stats for Pete Burns and Lou Dials
Pete Burns
Career
Per 9 Innings
7
1.02
Lou Dials
Career
Per 9 Innings
166
1.13
Pete Burns
Career
Per 9 Innings
7
1.02
Lou Dials
Career
Per 9 Innings
156
1.06
Pete Burns
Career
Per 9 Innings
46
6.68
Lou Dials
Career
Per 9 Innings
297
2.02
Pete Burns
Career
Per 9 Innings
43
6.24
Lou Dials
Career
Per 9 Innings
273
1.85
Pete Burns
Career
Per 9 Innings
93.48
93.48
Lou Dials
Career
Per 9 Innings
91.92
91.92
Pete Burns
Career
Per 9 Innings
6.143
6.143
Lou Dials
Career
Per 9 Innings
1.645
1.645
Pete Burns
Career
Per 9 Innings
100
100
Lou Dials
Career
Per 9 Innings
93.98
93.98