Pete Burns vs. Jack Cust — Career Comparison
Looking at the career totals, Pete Burns and Jack Cust are closely matched on the surface stats. Jack Cust posted stronger numbers in OPS (.816 vs .718) and slugging (.439 vs .333). Pete Burns had the advantage in on-base percentage (.385 vs .377). By the career numbers, Jack Cust had the stronger overall case — though those totals don't account for the eras and run environments each player worked in.
Hitting Stats for Pete Burns and Jack Cust
Pete Burns
Career
Per 600 PA
0.333
0.333
Jack Cust
Career
Per 600 PA
0.242
0.242
Pete Burns
Career
Per 600 PA
0.759
0.759
Jack Cust
Career
Per 600 PA
0.828
0.828
Pete Burns
Career
Per 600 PA
0.385
0.385
Jack Cust
Career
Per 600 PA
0.374
0.374
Pete Burns
Career
Per 600 PA
0.333
0.333
Jack Cust
Career
Per 600 PA
0.439
0.439
Pete Burns
Career
Per 600 PA
0.256
0.256
Jack Cust
Career
Per 600 PA
0.278
0.278
Pete Burns
Career
Per 600 PA
0.625
0.625
Jack Cust
Career
Per 600 PA
0.848
0.848
Pete Burns
Career
Per 600 PA
4.11
85.04
Jack Cust
Career
Per 600 PA
373.64
86.86
Fielding Stats for Pete Burns and Jack Cust
Pete Burns
Career
Per 9 Innings
7
1.02
Jack Cust
Career
Per 9 Innings
231
1.2
Pete Burns
Career
Per 9 Innings
7
1.02
Jack Cust
Career
Per 9 Innings
219
1.14
Pete Burns
Career
Per 9 Innings
46
6.68
Jack Cust
Career
Per 9 Innings
372
1.94
Pete Burns
Career
Per 9 Innings
43
6.24
Jack Cust
Career
Per 9 Innings
360
1.88
Pete Burns
Career
Per 9 Innings
93.48
93.48
Jack Cust
Career
Per 9 Innings
96.77
96.77
Pete Burns
Career
Per 9 Innings
6.143
6.143
Jack Cust
Career
Per 9 Innings
1.558
1.558
Pete Burns
Career
Per 9 Innings
100
100
Jack Cust
Career
Per 9 Innings
94.81
94.81