Joe Burns vs. Paul Radford — Career Comparison
On the career numbers, Paul Radford posted the stronger offensive profile against Joe Burns. Paul Radford posted stronger numbers in OPS (.660 vs .211) and on-base percentage (.351 vs .105). By the career numbers, Paul Radford had the stronger overall case — though those totals don't account for the eras and run environments each player worked in.
Hitting Stats for Joe Burns and Paul Radford
Joe Burns
Career
Per 600 PA
20
600
Paul Radford
Career
Per 600 PA
5822
600
Joe Burns
Career
Per 600 PA
0.105
0.105
Paul Radford
Career
Per 600 PA
0.242
0.242
Joe Burns
Career
Per 600 PA
0.25
0.25
Paul Radford
Career
Per 600 PA
0.732
0.732
Joe Burns
Career
Per 600 PA
0.19
5.63
Paul Radford
Career
Per 600 PA
706.94
72.85
Joe Burns
Career
Per 600 PA
0.105
0.105
Paul Radford
Career
Per 600 PA
0.351
0.351
Joe Burns
Career
Per 600 PA
0.105
0.105
Paul Radford
Career
Per 600 PA
0.308
0.308
Joe Burns
Career
Per 600 PA
0.074
0.074
Paul Radford
Career
Per 600 PA
0.235
0.235
Joe Burns
Career
Per 600 PA
0.118
0.118
Paul Radford
Career
Per 600 PA
0.72
0.72
Joe Burns
Career
Per 600 PA
10
10
Paul Radford
Career
Per 600 PA
12.97
12.97
Fielding Stats for Joe Burns and Paul Radford
Joe Burns
Career
Per 9 Innings
6
Paul Radford
Career
Per 9 Innings
1384
1.05
Joe Burns
Career
Per 9 Innings
15
Paul Radford
Career
Per 9 Innings
4485
3.41
Joe Burns
Career
Per 9 Innings
14
Paul Radford
Career
Per 9 Innings
3963
3.02
Joe Burns
Career
Per 9 Innings
93.33
Paul Radford
Career
Per 9 Innings
88.36
88.36
Joe Burns
Career
Per 9 Innings
2.333
Paul Radford
Career
Per 9 Innings
2.863
2.863