Jim Burns vs. Ed Glenn — Career Comparison
On the career numbers, Jim Burns posted the stronger offensive profile against Ed Glenn. Jim Burns posted stronger numbers in OPS (.737 vs .330) and on-base percentage (.341 vs .263). By the career numbers, Jim Burns had the stronger overall case — though those totals don't account for the eras and run environments each player worked in.
Hitting Stats for Jim Burns and Ed Glenn
Jim Burns
Career
Per 600 PA
0.305
0.305
Ed Glenn
Career
Per 600 PA
0.067
0.067
Jim Burns
Career
Per 600 PA
0.803
0.803
Ed Glenn
Career
Per 600 PA
0.557
0.557
Jim Burns
Career
Per 600 PA
0.341
0.341
Ed Glenn
Career
Per 600 PA
0.263
0.263
Jim Burns
Career
Per 600 PA
0.396
0.396
Ed Glenn
Career
Per 600 PA
0.067
0.067
Jim Burns
Career
Per 600 PA
0.252
0.252
Ed Glenn
Career
Per 600 PA
0.135
0.135
Jim Burns
Career
Per 600 PA
0.774
0.774
Ed Glenn
Career
Per 600 PA
0.429
0.429
Jim Burns
Career
Per 600 PA
120.54
94.42
Ed Glenn
Career
Per 600 PA
0.72
18.91
Jim Burns
Career
Per 600 PA
9.46
9.46
Ed Glenn
Career
Per 600 PA
4.6
4.6
Jim Burns
Career
Per 600 PA
0.33
0.33
Ed Glenn
Career
Per 600 PA
0.8
0.8
Jim Burns
Career
Per 600 PA
64
50.13
Ed Glenn
Career
Per 600 PA
1
26.09
Jim Burns
Career
Per 600 PA
100
100
Ed Glenn
Career
Per 600 PA
100
100
Fielding Stats for Jim Burns and Ed Glenn
Jim Burns
Career
Per 9 Innings
171
1.06
Ed Glenn
Career
Per 9 Innings
5
1.45
Jim Burns
Career
Per 9 Innings
446
2.76
Ed Glenn
Career
Per 9 Innings
13
3.77
Jim Burns
Career
Per 9 Innings
397
2.46
Ed Glenn
Career
Per 9 Innings
12
3.48
Jim Burns
Career
Per 9 Innings
89.01
89.01
Ed Glenn
Career
Per 9 Innings
92.31
92.31
Jim Burns
Career
Per 9 Innings
2.322
2.322
Ed Glenn
Career
Per 9 Innings
2.4
2.4