Ed Burns vs. Jim Tatum — Career Comparison
Looking at the career totals, Ed Burns and Jim Tatum are closely matched on the surface stats. Ed Burns posted stronger numbers in OPS (.579 vs .533) and on-base percentage (.308 vs .229). Jim Tatum had the advantage in slugging (.303 vs .271). By the career numbers, Ed Burns had the stronger overall case — though those totals don't account for the eras and run environments each player worked in.
Hitting Stats for Ed Burns and Jim Tatum
Ed Burns
Career
Per 600 PA
0.23
0.23
Jim Tatum
Career
Per 600 PA
0.194
0.194
Ed Burns
Career
Per 600 PA
0.623
0.623
Jim Tatum
Career
Per 600 PA
0.562
0.562
Ed Burns
Career
Per 600 PA
0.148
0.148
Jim Tatum
Career
Per 600 PA
0.333
0.333
Ed Burns
Career
Per 600 PA
0.308
0.308
Jim Tatum
Career
Per 600 PA
0.229
0.229
Ed Burns
Career
Per 600 PA
0.271
0.271
Jim Tatum
Career
Per 600 PA
0.304
0.304
Ed Burns
Career
Per 600 PA
0.042
0.042
Jim Tatum
Career
Per 600 PA
0.11
0.11
Ed Burns
Career
Per 600 PA
0.207
0.207
Jim Tatum
Career
Per 600 PA
0.179
0.179
Ed Burns
Career
Per 600 PA
0.522
0.522
Jim Tatum
Career
Per 600 PA
0.442
0.442
Ed Burns
Career
Per 600 PA
15.32
15.32
Jim Tatum
Career
Per 600 PA
3.76
3.76
Ed Burns
Career
Per 600 PA
1.41
1.41
Jim Tatum
Career
Per 600 PA
0.17
0.17
Fielding Stats for Ed Burns and Jim Tatum
Ed Burns
Career
Per 9 Innings
293
Jim Tatum
Career
Per 9 Innings
52
2.11
Ed Burns
Career
Per 9 Innings
1302
Jim Tatum
Career
Per 9 Innings
124
5.03
Ed Burns
Career
Per 9 Innings
97.31
Jim Tatum
Career
Per 9 Innings
98.41
98.41
Ed Burns
Career
Per 9 Innings
4.444
Jim Tatum
Career
Per 9 Innings
2.385
2.385