Ed Burns vs. Jack Little — Career Comparison
On the career numbers, Jack Little posted the stronger offensive profile against Ed Burns. Jack Little posted stronger numbers in OPS (.607 vs .579) and on-base percentage (.357 vs .308). Ed Burns had the advantage in slugging (.271 vs .250). By the career numbers, Jack Little had the stronger overall case — though those totals don't account for the eras and run environments each player worked in.
Hitting Stats for Ed Burns and Jack Little
Ed Burns
Career
Per 600 PA
0.23
0.23
Jack Little
Career
Per 600 PA
0.25
0.25
Ed Burns
Career
Per 600 PA
0.623
0.623
Jack Little
Career
Per 600 PA
0.75
0.75
Ed Burns
Career
Per 600 PA
0.308
0.308
Jack Little
Career
Per 600 PA
0.357
0.357
Ed Burns
Career
Per 600 PA
0.271
0.271
Jack Little
Career
Per 600 PA
0.25
0.25
Ed Burns
Career
Per 600 PA
0.207
0.207
Jack Little
Career
Per 600 PA
0.223
0.223
Ed Burns
Career
Per 600 PA
0.522
0.522
Jack Little
Career
Per 600 PA
0.778
0.778
Ed Burns
Career
Per 600 PA
15.32
15.32
Jack Little
Career
Per 600 PA
3.5
3.5
Ed Burns
Career
Per 600 PA
1.41
1.41
Jack Little
Career
Per 600 PA
0.25
0.25
Ed Burns
Career
Per 600 PA
14
9.29
Jack Little
Career
Per 600 PA
2
85.71
Ed Burns
Career
Per 600 PA
100
100
Jack Little
Career
Per 600 PA
100
100
Fielding Stats for Ed Burns and Jack Little
Ed Burns
Career
Per 9 Innings
293
Jack Little
Career
Per 9 Innings
3
Ed Burns
Career
Per 9 Innings
97.31
Jack Little
Career
Per 9 Innings
100