Ed Burns vs. Jack Farrell — Career Comparison
On the career numbers, Jack Farrell posted the stronger offensive profile against Ed Burns. Jack Farrell posted stronger numbers in OPS (.592 vs .579) and slugging (.287 vs .271). By the career numbers, Jack Farrell had the stronger overall case — though those totals don't account for the eras and run environments each player worked in.
Hitting Stats for Ed Burns and Jack Farrell
Ed Burns
Career
Per 600 PA
321
213.05
Jack Farrell
Career
Per 600 PA
226
158.97
Ed Burns
Career
Per 600 PA
904
600
Jack Farrell
Career
Per 600 PA
853
600
Ed Burns
Career
Per 600 PA
0.23
0.23
Jack Farrell
Career
Per 600 PA
0.229
0.229
Ed Burns
Career
Per 600 PA
0.623
0.623
Jack Farrell
Career
Per 600 PA
0.643
0.643
Ed Burns
Career
Per 600 PA
27
17.92
Jack Farrell
Career
Per 600 PA
38
26.73
Ed Burns
Career
Per 600 PA
0.148
0.148
Jack Farrell
Career
Per 600 PA
0.222
0.222
Ed Burns
Career
Per 600 PA
216
143.36
Jack Farrell
Career
Per 600 PA
214
150.53
Ed Burns
Career
Per 600 PA
273
181.19
Jack Farrell
Career
Per 600 PA
252
177.26
Ed Burns
Career
Per 600 PA
0.308
0.308
Jack Farrell
Career
Per 600 PA
0.305
0.305
Ed Burns
Career
Per 600 PA
0.271
0.271
Jack Farrell
Career
Per 600 PA
0.287
0.287
Ed Burns
Career
Per 600 PA
0.042
0.042
Jack Farrell
Career
Per 600 PA
0.058
0.058
Ed Burns
Career
Per 600 PA
0.207
0.207
Jack Farrell
Career
Per 600 PA
0.209
0.209
Ed Burns
Career
Per 600 PA
0.522
0.522
Jack Farrell
Career
Per 600 PA
0.548
0.548
Ed Burns
Career
Per 600 PA
87.09
57.8
Jack Farrell
Career
Per 600 PA
82.53
58.05
Ed Burns
Career
Per 600 PA
15.32
15.32
Jack Farrell
Career
Per 600 PA
10.28
10.28
Ed Burns
Career
Per 600 PA
1.41
1.41
Jack Farrell
Career
Per 600 PA
0.93
0.93
Ed Burns
Career
Per 600 PA
14
9.29
Jack Farrell
Career
Per 600 PA
20
14.07
Ed Burns
Career
Per 600 PA
100
100
Jack Farrell
Career
Per 600 PA
100
100
Fielding Stats for Ed Burns and Jack Farrell
Ed Burns
Career
Per 9 Innings
293
Jack Farrell
Career
Per 9 Innings
229
Ed Burns
Career
Per 9 Innings
97.31
Jack Farrell
Career
Per 9 Innings
95.02