Ed Burns vs. Chancelor Edwards — Career Comparison
On the career numbers, Ed Burns posted the stronger offensive profile against Chancelor Edwards. Ed Burns posted stronger numbers in OPS (.579 vs .245) and on-base percentage (.308 vs .138). By the career numbers, Ed Burns had the stronger overall case — though those totals don't account for the eras and run environments each player worked in.
Hitting Stats for Ed Burns and Chancelor Edwards
Ed Burns
Career
Per 600 PA
321
213.05
Chancelor Edwards
Career
Per 600 PA
10
200
Ed Burns
Career
Per 600 PA
904
600
Chancelor Edwards
Career
Per 600 PA
30
600
Ed Burns
Career
Per 600 PA
0.23
0.23
Chancelor Edwards
Career
Per 600 PA
0.107
0.107
Ed Burns
Career
Per 600 PA
0.623
0.623
Chancelor Edwards
Career
Per 600 PA
0.283
0.283
Ed Burns
Career
Per 600 PA
75.8
50.31
Chancelor Edwards
Career
Per 600 PA
0.4
7.93
Ed Burns
Career
Per 600 PA
273
181.19
Chancelor Edwards
Career
Per 600 PA
4
80
Ed Burns
Career
Per 600 PA
0.308
0.308
Chancelor Edwards
Career
Per 600 PA
0.138
0.138
Ed Burns
Career
Per 600 PA
0.271
0.271
Chancelor Edwards
Career
Per 600 PA
0.107
0.107
Ed Burns
Career
Per 600 PA
0.207
0.207
Chancelor Edwards
Career
Per 600 PA
0.089
0.089
Ed Burns
Career
Per 600 PA
0.522
0.522
Chancelor Edwards
Career
Per 600 PA
0.16
0.16
Ed Burns
Career
Per 600 PA
0.248
0.248
Chancelor Edwards
Career
Per 600 PA
0.107
0.107
Ed Burns
Career
Per 600 PA
15.32
15.32
Chancelor Edwards
Career
Per 600 PA
Ed Burns
Career
Per 600 PA
0
0
Chancelor Edwards
Career
Per 600 PA
0
0
Fielding Stats for Ed Burns and Chancelor Edwards
Ed Burns
Career
Per 9 Innings
293
Chancelor Edwards
Career
Per 9 Innings
10
1.36
Ed Burns
Career
Per 9 Innings
1338
Chancelor Edwards
Career
Per 9 Innings
44
6
Ed Burns
Career
Per 9 Innings
1302
Chancelor Edwards
Career
Per 9 Innings
43
5.86
Ed Burns
Career
Per 9 Innings
97.31
Chancelor Edwards
Career
Per 9 Innings
97.73
97.73
Ed Burns
Career
Per 9 Innings
4.444
Chancelor Edwards
Career
Per 9 Innings
4.3
4.3
Ed Burns
Career
Per 9 Innings
34
Chancelor Edwards
Career
Per 9 Innings
2
0.27