Ed Burns vs. Mike Costanzo — Career Comparison
On the career numbers, Ed Burns posted the stronger offensive profile against Mike Costanzo. Ed Burns posted stronger numbers in OPS (.579 vs .151) and on-base percentage (.308 vs .095). By the career numbers, Ed Burns had the stronger overall case — though those totals don't account for the eras and run environments each player worked in.
Hitting Stats for Ed Burns and Mike Costanzo
Ed Burns
Career
Per 600 PA
321
213.05
Mike Costanzo
Career
Per 600 PA
17
485.71
Ed Burns
Career
Per 600 PA
904
600
Mike Costanzo
Career
Per 600 PA
21
600
Ed Burns
Career
Per 600 PA
0.23
0.23
Mike Costanzo
Career
Per 600 PA
0.056
0.056
Ed Burns
Career
Per 600 PA
0.623
0.623
Mike Costanzo
Career
Per 600 PA
0.262
0.262
Ed Burns
Career
Per 600 PA
273
181.19
Mike Costanzo
Career
Per 600 PA
2
57.14
Ed Burns
Career
Per 600 PA
0.308
0.308
Mike Costanzo
Career
Per 600 PA
0.095
0.095
Ed Burns
Career
Per 600 PA
0.271
0.271
Mike Costanzo
Career
Per 600 PA
0.056
0.056
Ed Burns
Career
Per 600 PA
0.207
0.207
Mike Costanzo
Career
Per 600 PA
0.057
0.057
Ed Burns
Career
Per 600 PA
0.522
0.522
Mike Costanzo
Career
Per 600 PA
0.118
0.118
Ed Burns
Career
Per 600 PA
15.32
15.32
Mike Costanzo
Career
Per 600 PA
2.1
2.1
Ed Burns
Career
Per 600 PA
1.41
1.41
Mike Costanzo
Career
Per 600 PA
0.1
0.1
Fielding Stats for Ed Burns and Mike Costanzo
Ed Burns
Career
Per 9 Innings
293
Mike Costanzo
Career
Per 9 Innings
2
2.57
Ed Burns
Career
Per 9 Innings
1338
Mike Costanzo
Career
Per 9 Innings
10
12.86
Ed Burns
Career
Per 9 Innings
1302
Mike Costanzo
Career
Per 9 Innings
9
11.57
Ed Burns
Career
Per 9 Innings
97.31
Mike Costanzo
Career
Per 9 Innings
90
90
Ed Burns
Career
Per 9 Innings
4.444
Mike Costanzo
Career
Per 9 Innings
4.5
4.5