Ed Burns vs. Chuck Coles — Career Comparison
Looking at the career totals, Ed Burns and Chuck Coles are closely matched on the surface stats. Ed Burns had the edge in batting average (.230 vs .182). By the career numbers, Ed Burns had the stronger overall case — though those totals don't account for the eras and run environments each player worked in.
Hitting Stats for Ed Burns and Chuck Coles
Ed Burns
Career
Per 600 PA
0.23
0.23
Chuck Coles
Career
Per 600 PA
0.182
0.182
Ed Burns
Career
Per 600 PA
0.623
0.623
Chuck Coles
Career
Per 600 PA
0.615
0.615
Ed Burns
Career
Per 600 PA
0.148
0.148
Chuck Coles
Career
Per 600 PA
0.5
0.5
Ed Burns
Career
Per 600 PA
0.308
0.308
Chuck Coles
Career
Per 600 PA
0.308
0.308
Ed Burns
Career
Per 600 PA
0.271
0.271
Chuck Coles
Career
Per 600 PA
0.273
0.273
Ed Burns
Career
Per 600 PA
0.042
0.042
Chuck Coles
Career
Per 600 PA
0.091
0.091
Ed Burns
Career
Per 600 PA
0.207
0.207
Chuck Coles
Career
Per 600 PA
0.207
0.207
Ed Burns
Career
Per 600 PA
0.522
0.522
Chuck Coles
Career
Per 600 PA
0.556
0.556
Ed Burns
Career
Per 600 PA
87.09
57.8
Chuck Coles
Career
Per 600 PA
1.02
47.08
Ed Burns
Career
Per 600 PA
15.32
15.32
Chuck Coles
Career
Per 600 PA
2.17
2.17
Ed Burns
Career
Per 600 PA
1.41
1.41
Chuck Coles
Career
Per 600 PA
0.33
0.33
Fielding Stats for Ed Burns and Chuck Coles
Ed Burns
Career
Per 9 Innings
293
Chuck Coles
Career
Per 9 Innings
4
1.24
Ed Burns
Career
Per 9 Innings
1302
Chuck Coles
Career
Per 9 Innings
13
4.03
Ed Burns
Career
Per 9 Innings
97.31
Chuck Coles
Career
Per 9 Innings
100
100
Ed Burns
Career
Per 9 Innings
4.444
Chuck Coles
Career
Per 9 Innings
3.25
3.25