Mack Burk vs. Paul Radford — Career Comparison
On the career numbers, Mack Burk posted the stronger offensive profile against Paul Radford. Mack Burk posted stronger numbers in OPS (1.000 vs .660) and on-base percentage (.500 vs .351). Paul Radford had the advantage in home run production (13 career HR at a higher rate). By the career numbers, Mack Burk had the stronger overall case — though those totals don't account for the eras and run environments each player worked in.
Hitting Stats for Mack Burk and Paul Radford
Mack Burk
Career
Per 600 PA
16
4800
Paul Radford
Career
Per 600 PA
1361
140.26
Mack Burk
Career
Per 600 PA
2
600
Paul Radford
Career
Per 600 PA
5822
600
Mack Burk
Career
Per 600 PA
0.5
0.5
Paul Radford
Career
Per 600 PA
0.242
0.242
Mack Burk
Career
Per 600 PA
1
1
Paul Radford
Career
Per 600 PA
0.732
0.732
Mack Burk
Career
Per 600 PA
0.47
140.43
Paul Radford
Career
Per 600 PA
706.94
72.85
Mack Burk
Career
Per 600 PA
0.5
0.5
Paul Radford
Career
Per 600 PA
0.351
0.351
Mack Burk
Career
Per 600 PA
0.5
0.5
Paul Radford
Career
Per 600 PA
0.308
0.308
Mack Burk
Career
Per 600 PA
0.35
0.35
Paul Radford
Career
Per 600 PA
0.235
0.235
Mack Burk
Career
Per 600 PA
0.52
156.97
Paul Radford
Career
Per 600 PA
745.58
76.84
Mack Burk
Career
Per 600 PA
2
2
Paul Radford
Career
Per 600 PA
12.97
12.97
Fielding Stats for Mack Burk and Paul Radford
Mack Burk
Career
Per 9 Innings
1
9
Paul Radford
Career
Per 9 Innings
1384
1.05
Mack Burk
Career
Per 9 Innings
1
9
Paul Radford
Career
Per 9 Innings
4485
3.41
Mack Burk
Career
Per 9 Innings
1
9
Paul Radford
Career
Per 9 Innings
3963
3.02
Mack Burk
Career
Per 9 Innings
100
100
Paul Radford
Career
Per 9 Innings
88.36
88.36
Mack Burk
Career
Per 9 Innings
1
1
Paul Radford
Career
Per 9 Innings
2.863
2.863