Mark Budzinski vs. Jim McKeever — Career Comparison
On the career numbers, Jim McKeever posted the stronger offensive profile against Mark Budzinski. Jim McKeever posted stronger numbers in OPS (.273 vs .000) and on-base percentage (.136 vs .000). By the career numbers, Jim McKeever had the stronger overall case — though those totals don't account for the eras and run environments each player worked in.
Hitting Stats for Mark Budzinski and Jim McKeever
Mark Budzinski
Career
Per 600 PA
4
342.86
Jim McKeever
Career
Per 600 PA
16
145.45
Mark Budzinski
Career
Per 600 PA
7
600
Jim McKeever
Career
Per 600 PA
66
600
Mark Budzinski
Career
Per 600 PA
0
0
Jim McKeever
Career
Per 600 PA
0.136
0.136
Mark Budzinski
Career
Per 600 PA
0
0
Jim McKeever
Career
Per 600 PA
0.096
0.096
Mark Budzinski
Career
Per 600 PA
-0.74
-63.66
Jim McKeever
Career
Per 600 PA
-0.43
-3.91
Mark Budzinski
Career
Per 600 PA
1.75
1.75
Jim McKeever
Career
Per 600 PA
Mark Budzinski
Career
Per 600 PA
0
0
Jim McKeever
Career
Per 600 PA
0
0
Fielding Stats for Mark Budzinski and Jim McKeever
Mark Budzinski
Career
Per 9 Innings
1
1.13
Jim McKeever
Career
Per 9 Innings
16
1.27
Mark Budzinski
Career
Per 9 Innings
24
27
Jim McKeever
Career
Per 9 Innings
339
27
Mark Budzinski
Career
Per 9 Innings
8
9
Jim McKeever
Career
Per 9 Innings
113
9
Mark Budzinski
Career
Per 9 Innings
3
3.38
Jim McKeever
Career
Per 9 Innings
96
7.65
Mark Budzinski
Career
Per 9 Innings
3
3.38
Jim McKeever
Career
Per 9 Innings
124
9.88
Mark Budzinski
Career
Per 9 Innings
3
3.38
Jim McKeever
Career
Per 9 Innings
108
8.6
Mark Budzinski
Career
Per 9 Innings
100
100
Jim McKeever
Career
Per 9 Innings
87.1
87.1
Mark Budzinski
Career
Per 9 Innings
3
3
Jim McKeever
Career
Per 9 Innings
6.75
6.75
Mark Budzinski
Career
Per 9 Innings
0
0
Jim McKeever
Career
Per 9 Innings
0
0