Mark Budaska vs. Unknown Proctor — Career Comparison
A full statistical comparison isn't possible here, but the available career numbers offer some indication. Unknown Proctor had the edge in on-base percentage (1.000 vs .268). By the career numbers, Unknown Proctor had the stronger overall case — though those totals don't account for the eras and run environments each player worked in.
Hitting Stats for Mark Budaska and Unknown Proctor
Mark Budaska
Career
Per 600 PA
13
190.24
Unknown Proctor
Career
Per 600 PA
1
600
Mark Budaska
Career
Per 600 PA
41
600
Unknown Proctor
Career
Per 600 PA
1
600
Mark Budaska
Career
Per 600 PA
0.512
0.512
Unknown Proctor
Career
Per 600 PA
1.5
1.5
Mark Budaska
Career
Per 600 PA
2.24
32.76
Unknown Proctor
Career
Per 600 PA
1
600
Mark Budaska
Career
Per 600 PA
11
160.98
Unknown Proctor
Career
Per 600 PA
1
600
Mark Budaska
Career
Per 600 PA
0.268
0.268
Unknown Proctor
Career
Per 600 PA
1
1
Mark Budaska
Career
Per 600 PA
0.176
0.176
Unknown Proctor
Career
Per 600 PA
Mark Budaska
Career
Per 600 PA
1.98
28.98
Unknown Proctor
Career
Per 600 PA
0.34
205.73
Mark Budaska
Career
Per 600 PA
3.42
3.42
Unknown Proctor
Career
Per 600 PA
Mark Budaska
Career
Per 600 PA
0
0
Unknown Proctor
Career
Per 600 PA
0
0
Fielding Stats for Mark Budaska and Unknown Proctor
Mark Budaska
Career
Per 9 Innings
2
1.8
Unknown Proctor
Career
Per 9 Innings
1
3.86
Mark Budaska
Career
Per 9 Innings
30
27
Unknown Proctor
Career
Per 9 Innings
7
27
Mark Budaska
Career
Per 9 Innings
10
9
Unknown Proctor
Career
Per 9 Innings
2.1
9
Mark Budaska
Career
Per 9 Innings
0
0
Unknown Proctor
Career
Per 9 Innings
0
0
Mark Budaska
Career
Per 9 Innings
0
0
Unknown Proctor
Career
Per 9 Innings
0
0